green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Moses Loud Hawk, Russ James Redner, Dennis James Banks, and Darlene Pearl Nichols, AKA Kamook Banks
(2×)
Exactly where that point lies on the spectrum of pretrial delay is uncertain, but it is clear that the longer the delay, the heavier the weight to be given it in the balance. 37 United States v. Macino, 486 F.2d 750, 752 (7th Cir.1973); see United States v. Holt, 448 F.2d 1108, 1109 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971). 38 The other three Barker v. Wingo factors also contribute, on balance, to our conclusion that defendants' speedy trial rights have been violated in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rebecca Ann Smith, United States of America v. Clifford Rickard Arthur
(2×)
In my view, the Youth Corrections Act requires that any such period of confinement be served in a treatment-type facility. 18 U.S.C. § 5011 ; see Harvin v. United States, 445 F.2d 675 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971). 7 In United States v. Roberts, the court did not discuss the complex questions involved in attempting to reconcile the Youth Corrections Act with the later-adopted amendment to the general probation statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salzmann
See United States v. Holt, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 185 , 448 F.2d 1108, 1111 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971); United States v. Butler, 426 F.2d 1275, 1278 (1st Cir.), aff’d after remand, 434 F.2d 243 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 978 , 91 S.Ct. 1207 , 28 L.Ed.2d 328 (1971); United States v. Reed, 285 F.Supp. 738, 741 (D.D.C. 1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morrison
See, Jankord v. State, 290 Minn. 168 , 186 N. W. 2d 530 , certiorari denied, 404 U. S. 942 , 92 S. Ct. 292 , 30 L. ed. 2d 757 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas W. Bishton
See United States v. Holt, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 185 , 448 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971); Harling v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 327 , 401 F.2d 392 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 725 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome F. Donelson, United States of America v. Andre Washington
See, e.g., Earvin v. United States, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 445 F.2d 675 (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971); United States v. Fort, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 255 , 272, 443 F.2d 670, 687 (1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2255 , 29 L.Ed.2d 710 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Outing v. Bell
See, e. g., Harvin v. United States, 445 F.2d 675 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971) (absolute ban on confining youth offenders in a penitentiary); Abernathy v. United States, 418 F.2d 288 .(5th Cir. 1969) (YCA inmate could be assigned to a penitentiary). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Lois Sero v. Peter Preiser
See also Harvin v. United States, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 445 F.2d 675 (en banc) (interpreting parallel provision of the Youth Corrections Act), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perry Lynch
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Holt, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 185 , 448 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1969); Harling v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 327 , 401 F.2d 392 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 725 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969); Hedgepeth v. United States, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 364 F.2d 684 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony MacIno and Robert Walensky
(2×)
See e. g., United States v. Holt, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 185 , 448 F.2d 1108 cert. denied, 404 U.S. 942 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971). 27 The second factor to be weighed is the reason for the delay given by government.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin v. United States
(2×)
See also Harvin v. United States, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 445 F.2d 675 (1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 292 , 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
White
v.
Cardwell, Warden
v.
Cardwell, Warden
No. 71-5159.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1971.
Published
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.