green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bartholdi Cable Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 , 1157 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 461 , 34 L.Ed.2d 321 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Bartholdi Cable Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 , 1157 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 461 , 34 L.Ed.2d 321 (1972).
examined
Cited "see"
United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(3×)
See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 459 F.2d 1203, 1207 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 461 , 34 L.Ed.2d 321 (1972) (WAIT II); Sudbrink Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 509 F.2d 418, 422 (D.C.Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Jenkins v. Louisiana State Board of Education v. Elmer Glynn Pitre, Intervenors-Appellants
(2×)
See Linwood v. Board of Education, 463 F.2d 763 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 475 , 34 L.Ed.2d 320 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
People in Interest of KP
See Linwood v. Board *414 of Education, City of Peoria, 463 F.2d 763 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 475 , 34 L.Ed.2d 320 (1972) [permitting suspension or expulsion for “gross disobedience or misconduct”]; Southern v. Board of Trustees for Dallas Independent School District, 318 F. Supp. 355 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Dalton
While accomplice testimony must be corroborated to convict a defendant (see CPL 60.22 [1]), children who participate in the crime must do so with the required mental state to be considered accomplices (see CPL 60.22 [3]; see also People v Wheatman, 31 NY2d 12, 22 [1972], cert denied 409 US 1027 [1972]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., Intervenors
(2×)
As we recently had occasion to note, "[a]n applicant for a waiver not only bears the burden of convincing the agency that it should depart from the rules, but on judicial appeal, the applicant must show that the agency's reasonings for declining the waiver were 'so insubstantial as to render that denial an abuse of discretion.' " Thomas Radio Co. v. FCC, 716 F.2d 921, 924 (D.C.Cir.1983); see also ICBC Corp. v. FCC, 716 F.2d 926, 929 (D.C.Cir.1983) WAIT Radio v. FCC, 459 F.2d 1203, 1207 (D.C.Cir.) (" 'An applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.' On ... appeal to this …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kearns v. Board of Education
Ed. 2d 725 , 95 S. Ct. 729 ; see also Linwood v. Board of Education (7th Cir. 1972), 463 F. 2d 763 , 769-70, cert. denied (1972), 409 U.S. 1027 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Baker
See also United States v. McBride, 463 F.2d 44 (5th Cir., 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 1027 , 93 S.Ct. 475 , 34 L.Ed.2d 320 , and McCroskey v. United States, 339 F.2d 895 (8th Cir., 1965), applying the comparable Federal rule.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McBride
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 72-5396.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 20, 1972.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.