green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sanders v. State
See, Commonwealth v. Bennett (1976), 245 Pa.Super. 457 , 369 A.2d 493 ; but see also, People v. Jones (1973), 30 Cal.App.3d 852 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 749 , appeal dismissed 414 U.S. 804 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 40 . 29 Ill.Dec. at 52 , 391 N.E.2d at 211 .
cited
Cited "but see"
People v. Fidler
See Commonwealth v. Bennett (1976), 245 Pa. Super. 457 , 369 A.2d 493 ; but see also People v. Jones (1973), 30 Cal. App. 3d 852 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 749 , appeal dismissed (1973), 414 U.S. 804 , 38 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Indiana Department of Correction v. Indiana Civil Rights Commission
Burdine, 450 U.S. at 256 , 101 S.Ct. at 1095 , 67 LEd.2d at 217; McDonnell Douglas, 414 U.S. at 804-05, 98 S.Ct. at 1825-26, 86 LEd.2d at 679; Delesstine, at 134.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Package Store Ass'n v. Koch
That clause, it has been said, ‘is applicable to a taxing statute * * * only if the act be so arbitrary as to compel the conclusion that it does not involve an assertion of the taxing power, but constitutes, in substance and effect, the direct exertion of a different and forbidden power, as, for example, the confiscation of property’ ” (Ampco Printing-Advertisers’ Offset Corp. v City of New York, 14 NY2d 11, 24 , app dsmd 379 US 5 , quoting from Magnano Co. v Hamilton, 292 US 40, 44 ; see Shapiro v City of New York, 32 NY2d 96, 102 , app dsmd 414 US 804 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n of Independent Insurers v. State
That clause, it has been said, 'is applicable to a taxing statute * * * only if the act be so arbitrary as to compel the conclusion that it does not involve an assertion of the taxing power, but constitutes, in substance and effect, the direct assertion of a different and forbidden power, as, for example, the confiscation of property’ ” (Ampco Print-Advertisers’ Offset Corp. v City of New York, 14 NY2d 11, 24 , appeal dismissed 379 US 5 , quoting Magnano Co. v Hamilton, 292 US 40, 44 ; see also, Shapiro v City of New York, 32 NY2d 96, 102 , appeal dismissed 414 US 804 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gottfried, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
See, e.g., Simanco, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 57 Wis. 2d 47, 51 , 203 N.W.2d 648, 650 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 804 (1973) (noting that a liquidation redemption of stock is treated as a sale by the stockholders).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eskel Norbeck v. Davenport Community School District
(2×)
See also Shelofsky v. Helsby, 32 N.Y.2d 54 , 343 N.Y.S.2d 98 , 295 N.E.2d 774 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 804 , 94 S.Ct. 60 , 38 L.Ed.2d 41 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Insurance Company of North America
v.
Montgomery, Director, Financial Institutions of Illinois
v.
Montgomery, Director, Financial Institutions of Illinois
No. 72-1735.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Appeal from App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.