Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John Martins
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Nathan, 476 F.2d 456, 458-59 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 171 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973) (dual sentences upheld where single conspiracy violated both § 174, proscribing an importation conspiracy, and 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (the general conspiracy statute), as applied to 26 U.S.C.A. § 4704 (proscribing certain narcotics possession conspiracies)). 17 Without any discussion of congressional intent (or double jeopardy), the Sixth Circuit in United States v. Adcock, 487 F.2d 637 (1973), became the first to consider dual convictions under the specific conspirac…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John K. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County Kentucky
Court review, it is true, encompasses “the manner and methods [by which a congressional committee] obtain[s] certain information.” United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213 , 225 n. 20 (4th Cir.) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 866, 94 S.Ct. 124 , 132, 38 L.Ed.2d 56, 118 (1973); see McSurely II, 553 F.2d at 1287 (“[A] Member of Congress or congressional employee is not free to use every conceivable means to obtain investigatory materials, without fear of criminal prosecution or civil suit.”) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Slawik
Ct. 124, 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973) (pressure of potential indictment and promise of immunity likewise were held insufficient); Black v. United States, 341 F.2d 583 (C.A. 9, 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 854 , 86 S.Ct. 105 , 15 L.Ed.2d 92 (1965) (“special employee” status of and promise to arrestee to make his cooperation “known” to prosecutor’s office was also held to be insufficient).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Andrews
(2×)
Accord United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213 (4th Cir.) (tapes of private conversations admissible where one of the parties to the conversation has consented to the surveillance), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973); Roller v. McKellar, 711 F.Supp. 272 (D.S.C.1989) (Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act and the Fourth Amendment do not protect parties to intercepted conversation who speak with no legitimate expectation of privacy; no violation occurs when a party to a conversation consents to its interception); State v. Pecina, 184 Ariz. 238 , 908 P.2d 52 (App.19…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Knight
See United States v. Boulier, 359 F.Supp 165, 170-71 (E.D.N.Y.1972), aff'd, 476 F.2d 456 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 171 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213, 229 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 ; United States v. Silva, 449 F.2d 145, 146 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 942 , 30 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce Mitchell
See United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213, 229 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973) (pressure of potential indictment and promise of immunity insufficient to vitiate consent); United States v. Silva, 449 F.2d 145 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 942 , 30 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (promise of suspended sentence in reference to pending indictment insufficient); Black v. United States, 341 F.2d 583 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 854 , 86 S.Ct. 105 , 15 L.Ed.2d 92 (1965) (“special employee” status of and promise to arrestee to make his.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ingram
His plea, therefore, was timely for the purposes of § 3E1.1. 8 It is well established that “a defendant who materially breaches a plea agreement may not claim its benefits.” United States v. Merritt, 988 F.2d 1298, 1313 (2d Cir.1993); see also United States v. Nathan, 476 F.2d 456 ,.459 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 171 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alford v. City of Dallas
(2×)
See Hancock, 239 S.W.2d at 791 ; see also Coulter v. Melady, 489 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkanna 1972, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (due process clause of the Texas constitution protects vested property rights), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 123 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Grand Jury Investigation into Possible Violations of Title 18
Compare United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213 , 224 n.20 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973); Kaye, Congres sional Papers, Judicial Subpoenas, and the Constitution, 24 U.C.L.A.L.Rev. 523, 563 n.172 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan
See also United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213 , 224 n. 20 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973). 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Stassi, A/K/A Joe Rogers
See, e. g., United States v. Nathan, 476 F.2d 456, 460 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 171 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973); United States v. Miranda, 526 F.2d 1319, 1331 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied — U.S. —, 97 S.Ct. 69 , 50 L.Ed.2d 82 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McGowan
Compare United States v. Nathan, 476 F.2d 456 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 171 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973), with United States v. Adcock, 487 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1973). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dugas
v.
Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
v.
Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
No. 72-1530.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Cited by 110 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.