green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…it is axiomatic that a decision of a federal trial court, while persuasive if well-reasoned, is not by any means binding on the courts of a state
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Miller v. State
in general, tenured public employees can only be discharged 'for cause' established in a hearing, while probationary public employees can be discharged for any reason or no reason and have no right to a hearing on the ground therefor.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Monroe
both venue and territorial jurisdiction of a federal district court in criminal cases depend on some part of the criminal activity having occurred within its territory.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants. Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. Rose Mofford, Individually and as Governor of the State of Arizona Robert Corbin, Individually and as Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellees
it is axiomatic that a decision of a federal trial court, while persuasive if well-reasoned, is not by any means binding on the courts of a state
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Yniguez v. Arizona
it is axiomatic that a decision of a federal trial court, while persuasive if well-reasoned, is not by any means binding on the courts of a state
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. University of Oregon
See Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Bd. of Higher Educ., 14 Or.App. 130, 170 , 511 P.2d 854 , rev. denied (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Bond v. United States
See Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Bruton v. United States
See Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 531 , 1973 WL 21341 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morris Kinsey D/B/A Kinsey Farms, Inc. v. The United States
Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 217, 225 (1964) (citations omitted); accord Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 532 (1973) (quoting Oceanic, 165 Ct.Cl. at 225 ), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974). * In September 1980, the FmHA withdrew the funds it had loaned to Kinsey.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinsey v. United States
DISCUSSION The issue before this court is whether plaintiff’s claim for damages based on the alleged wrongful termination of two FmHA loans is barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (1976), which provided as of 1980, as it does today: “Every claim of which the ... [United States Claims Court] has jurisdiction shall be barred unless the petition thereon is filed within six years after such claim first accrues.” The rationale behind the statute of limitation’s denial of certain claims, even if they have merit, is that the limitation is “necessary in order to insure prompt handling of claims and t…
cited
Cited "see"
Fernandez v. United States
See Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 539 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Rogers v. United States
See Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 539 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974), and the cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sohm v. United States
See Parker v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 399, 402 (1983) (NETTESHEIM, J.) (citing Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 539 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974)). 1 The parties also concur that July 31,1970, six years after plaintiff was retired on July 31, 1964, was a Friday, and that August 3, 1970, the date the petition was filed in the Court of Claims, fell on a Monday.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Lillian Reis, Cross-Appellee v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
See Bradshaw v. State, 286 So.2d 4 (Fla.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 225 (1974); Stonom v. Wainwright, 235 So.2d 545 (Fla. App.1970). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Marvin Townsend
See United States v. Luton, 486 F.2d 1021, 1023 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 417 U.S. 920 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 225 (1974); United States v. Legato, 480 F.2d 408, 413 (5th Cir.) (alternate holding), cert. denied 414 U.S. 979 , 94 S.Ct. 295 , 38 L.Ed.2d 223 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Myers v. United States
See also Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 532-33 , 1973 WL 21341 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dico, Inc. v. United States
See also Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 539 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974) (statute of limitations is jurisdictional and must be strictly construed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McDonnal v. United States
The date of accrual is “the date when all the events have occurred which fix the liability of the Government and entitle the claimant to institute an action.” Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 217, 225 (1964); see also Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 532 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974), and Sauer v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 642, 647 , 354 F.2d 302, 304 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Saffron v. Department of the Navy
Compare Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 , 94 S.Ct. 2626 , 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974); Middleman v. United States, 91 Ct.Cl. 306, 307-308 (1941); Perry v. United States, 405 F.Supp. 1061, 1063 (E.D.Mo.1975). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Papadopoulos
v.
Oregon State Board of Higher Education
v.
Oregon State Board of Higher Education
No. 73-1311.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1974.
Certiorari.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice .Douglas would grant certiorari.