“the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation' so long as 'the selection was not deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. McKenna
the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation' so long as 'the selection was not deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Dw
See Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 54 L.Ed.2d 511, 519, 549, 554-55, 54 L.Ed.2d 511, 519 , reh'g denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newmark v. Williams
See Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549, 554 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 , reh’g denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 232 , 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1541 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) (“primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.”); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-35 , 45 S.Ct. 571, 573 , 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neustein v. Orbach
See Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549, 554 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 reh’g denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 658 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1216 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399-401 , 43 S.Ct. 625, 626-27 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dunbar
See Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357 , 98 S.Ct. 663 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604 , reh’g denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978) (Court narrowly sustains plea bargaining conditioned on prosecutorial abandonment of claim of habitual offender status); see also Klein, “Habitual Offender Legislation and the Bargaining Process,” 15 Crim.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LaBarge v. State
See also Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357 , 98 S.Ct. 663 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604 (1978), reh’g denied 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Kinkead Industries, Inc. And United States Gypsum Company, Defendants
See, e.g., Austin v. Marco Dental Prod., Inc., 560 F.2d 966, 973 , 195 USPQ 529, 534 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 , 197 USPQ 448 (1978) (no intervening rights when claims are “substantially identical”); Akron Brass Co. v. Elkhart Brass Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Omark Industries, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.
See, e.g., Austin v. Marco Dental Products, Inc., 560 F.2d 966, 972 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Penn International Industries, a California Corporation v. The Pennington Corporation, a California Corporation, the Bedroom, a Corporation, and the Comfort Zone, a Corporation, and William Pennington, an Individual American Thermo Seal, Inc. v. Penn International Industries, Inc.
See also Austin v. Marco Dental Products, 560 F.2d 966, 970 (9th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978). 18 In Graham the Supreme Court approved appraisal of secondary considerations such as "commercial success, long felt but unsolved needs, failure of others, etc.," to cast light on the circumstances surrounding the origin of the item sought to be patented.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Photo Electronics Corporation v. John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Ferrex Corporation, Photo Electronics Corporation v. Ferrex Corporation
See also Austin v. Marco Dental Products, 560 F.2d 966, 971 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1477 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Penn International Industries v. Pennington Corp.
See also Austin v. Marco Dental Products, 560 F.2d 966, 970 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 1477 , 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marco Dental Products, Inc.
v.
Austin
v.
Austin
No. 77-1046.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 1978.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White would grant certiorari.