green
Positive treatment
published
Doctrinal family: California Computer Products, In… ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Cited for
58 L. Ed. 2d at 167 cited at this page2 citing cases
- United States v. Donald v. Anderson, 618 F.2d 487 (8th Cir. 1980).publishedUnited States v. Jackson, 576 F.2d 749, 756 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 858, 99 S.Ct. 102 , 175, 58 L.Ed.2d 122, 167 (1978).
- United States v. Philip Anthony Stegora, 849 F.2d 291 (8th Cir. 1988).publishedSee United States v. Jackson, 576 F.2d 749, 757 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 858, 99 S.Ct. 102 , 175, 58 L.Ed.2d 122, 167 (1978).
Thus, as stated in Hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.
- State of Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Maricopa Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Pima Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. & Pima Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp., State of Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Maricopa Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. & Pima Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp., 643 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980).published(Thus, as stated in Hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.)
- Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, 643 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980).published(Thus, as stated in Hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.”
- State of Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Maricopa Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Pima Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. & Pima Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp., State of Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. Maricopa Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp. & Pima Found. for Med. Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corp., 643 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980).published“thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.”
- Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Med. Soc'y, 643 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980).published“thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.”
Other citing cases
- A.A. Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc., 683 F. Supp. 680 (S.D. Ind. 1988).published
- A. H. Cox & Co. v. Star Mach. Co., 653 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1981).published
- Rebel Oil Co. v. Atl. Richfield Co., 51 F.3d 1421 (9th Cir. 1995).published
- United States v. Steven E. Rogers, 9 F.3d 1025 (2d Cir. 1993).published
- U.S. Philips Corp. & North Am. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp., Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 861 F.2d 695 (Fed. Cir. 1989).published
- Williams v. Collins Commc'ns, Inc., 720 P.2d 880 (Wyo. 1986).published
- MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983).published
- Quality Foods De Centro Am., S.A. & Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp., S.A., 711 F.2d 989 (11th Cir. 1983).published
- Gweldon Lee Paschall & All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Co., 695 F.2d 322 (8th Cir. 1982).published
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Cont'l Baking Co., Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Cont'l Baking Co., Inc., 668 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1982).published
Show 27 more citing cases
- Island Tobacco Co. v. R. J. Reynolds Indus., Inc., 513 F. Supp. 726 (D. Haw. 1981).published
- Laverne Chisholm v. Def. Logistics Agency & Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 656 F.2d 42 (3d Cir. 1981).published
- Ne. Tel. Co. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 651 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1981).published
- Richter Concrete Corp. v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc., 547 F. Supp. 893 (S.D. Ohio 1981).published
- Ryan-Walsh Stevedoring Co. v. Gen. Longshore Workers Union, Local No. 3000, 509 F. Supp. 463 (E.D. La. 1981).published
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., & Mission Gas Oil Co., Inc. & Petroleum Prods. Co. v. Texaco, Inc, 637 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1980).published
- Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 495 F. Supp. 619 (M.D.N.C. 1980).published
- In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices, Etc., 481 F. Supp. 965 (N.D. Cal. 1979).published
- George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Bhd. of Painters & Allied Trades, Dist. Council No. 21, 480 F. Supp. 120 (E.D. Pa. 1979).published
- Dart Drug Corp. v. Corning Glass Works, 480 F. Supp. 1091 (D. Md. 1979).published
- California Steel & Tube v. Kaiser Steel Corp., 469 F. Supp. 265 (C.D. Cal. 1979).published
- In Re Multidistrict Veh. Air Pollution. Amf, Inc., 591 F.2d 68 (9th Cir. 1979).published
- AMF, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 591 F.2d 68 (9th Cir. 1979).published
- John E. Trytko, Jr. v. Hubbell, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 28 F.3d 715 (7th Cir. 1994).published
- Int'l Distrib. Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co., 812 F.2d 786 (2d Cir. 1987).published
- Int'l Distrib. Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co., 812 F.2d 786 (2d Cir. 1987).published
- Norton Tire Co. v. Tire Kingdom Co., 108 F.R.D. 371 (S.D. Fla. 1985).published
- Hahnemann Univ. v. Dist. 1199c, Nat'l Union of Hosp. & Health Care Employees & Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 765 F.2d 38 (3d Cir. 1985).published
- M.A.P. Oil Co. v. Texaco Inc., 691 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir. 1982).published
- Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc., a Texas Corp. v. Cpc Int'l Inc., 679 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1982).published
- O. Hommel Co. v. Ferro Corp., 659 F.2d 340 (3d Cir. 1981).published
- Unijax, Inc. v. Champion Int'l, Inc., 516 F. Supp. 941 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).published
- Nat'l Pork Producers Council v. Bergland, 631 F.2d 1353 (8th Cir. 1980).published
- Wilkes-Barre Publ'g Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120, 504 F. Supp. 54 (M.D. Pa. 1980).published
- Chillicothe Sand & Gravel Co., a Delaware Corp. v. Martin Marietta Corp., a Maryland Corp., 615 F.2d 427 (7th Cir. 1980).published
- Graphic Arts Int'l Union, Local 97-B v. Haddon Craftsmen, Inc., 489 F. Supp. 1088 (M.D. Pa. 1979).published
- Harvey Bell v. Iml Freight, Inc., 589 F.2d 502 (10th Cir. 1979).published
Unification Church
v.
Bell, Attorney General
v.
Bell, Attorney General
No. 77-1695.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published opinion
Cited by 165 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.