green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Black
See United States v. LeBlanc, 612 F.2d 1012, 1014 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 137 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980); United States v. Vincent, 20 F.3d 229, 234 (6th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Repp v. Lloyd Webber
See Scott v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 449 F.Supp. 518, 520 (D.D.C.1978) (finding speculations and inferences as to access were insufficient to meet defendants’ summary judgment challenge), aff'd, 607 F.2d 494 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 137 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
William G. Webb v. Thomas F. Keohane, Jr., Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana and Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of Indiana
See Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980) (§ 2255 proceeding); United States v. Boggs, 612 F.2d 991, 993 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 857 , 101 S.Ct. 156 , 66 L.Ed.2d 72 (1980) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
See Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980); United States v. Eaddy, 595 F.2d 341, 346 (6th Cir.1979); cf. United States v. Boggs, 612 F.2d 991, 993 (5th Cir.) (failure to raise alleged violation of IAD until § 2255 motion to vacate sentence con *654 stitutes waiver), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 857 , 101 S.Ct. 156 , 66 L.Ed.2d 72 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Percival Johnson, Kathleen M. Johnson
See Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980); United States v. Eaddy, 595 F.2d 341, 346 (6th Cir.1979); cf. United States v. Boggs, 612 F.2d 991, 993 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 857 , 101 S.Ct. 156 , 66 L.Ed.2d 72 (1980) (claim of violation of Interstate Agreement on Detainers waived if not raised until § 2255 motion to vacate sentence).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. Feldman
See United States v. LeBlanc, 612 F.2d 1012, 1017 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 137 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980); Twitty v. Smith, 614 F.2d 325, 331 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. DeLaMotte, 434 F.2d 289, 293 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, *767 401 U.S. 921 , 91 S.Ct. 910 , 27 L.Ed.2d 825 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Elo
See Metheny v. Hamby, 835 F.2d 672, 674 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 913 , 109 S.Ct. 270 , 102 L.Ed.2d 258 (1988) (holding that state prisoner’s claim that state violated IV(e) of the IAD was not a fundamental defect, absent exceptional circumstances, not present in the case); Browning v. Foltz, 837 F.2d 276 (6th Cir.1988); See also Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick Wayne Kerr v. Fred Finkbeiner, Warden Gerald Baliles, Attorney General of Virginia
See also Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980) (alleged violations of Article IV(e) trial-before-return provision and Article IV(c) 120-day time limit not cognizable under § 2255 as petitioner failed to show actual prejudice); Fasano v. Hall, 615 F.2d 555 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980) (alleged violation of Article 111(a) 180-day time provision and other alleged IADA violations not cognizable under § 2254 as they did not constitute fundamental defects); Huff v. United St…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Quema Holloway
See also United States v. LeBlanc, 612 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 137 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edgar J. Greathouse v. United States
See, e. g., Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 706-707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 849 , 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980); United States v. Black, 609 F.2d 1330, 1334 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 847 , 101 S.Ct. 132 , 66 L.Ed.2d 56 (1980); Camp v. United States, 587 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1978); United States v. Palmer, 574 F.2d 164 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 437 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 3097 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rinaldi v. Viking Penguin, Inc.
In what may be a swing of the pendulum the other way, the court observed that, since “ [t]he proof of ‘actual malice’ calls a defendant’s state of mind into question”, such a case “does not readily lend itself to summary disposition” (Hutchinson v Proxmire, 443 US 111, 120, n 9 ; see, also, Wolston v Reader’s Digest Assn., 443 US 157, 161, n 3 , supra; cf. Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, 174-175 ; see, also, Yiamouyiannis v Consumers Union of U. S., 619 F2d 932, cert den 49 USLW 3247 ; National Nutritional Foods Assn. v Whelan, 492 F Supp 374 ; Berkey v Delia, 287 Md 302; National…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tomas L. Kowalak v. United States
(2×)
See also Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 708 (6th Cir.) (Edwards, dissenting), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 138 , 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980). 18 I concur, however, with remand for consideration of the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel. 1 The dissent's reliance on United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340 , 98 S.Ct. 1834 , 56 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978), is puzzling.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gordon
v.
Redman, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Redman, Correctional Superintendent
No. 79-6545.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.