green
Positive treatment
published
1.0 score
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“Where a particular date is not a substantive element of the crime charged, strict chronological specificity or accuracy is not required.”
- State v. Miller, 466 S.E.2d 507 (W. Va. 1995).published“Where a particular date is not a substantive element of the crime charged, strict chronological specificity or accuracy is not required.”
- United States v. Andres Gabriel Bello-Perez, A/K/A Garby, 977 F.2d 664 (1st Cir. 1992).published“Where a particular date is not a substantive element of the crime charged, strict chronological specificity or accuracy is not required.”
Other citing cases
- United States v. Dowdell, 464 F. Supp. 2d 64 (D. Mass. 2006).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bivins
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-6603.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1983.
Published opinion
461 U.S. 947
1983 U.S. LEXIS 262
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · West Virginia Supreme Court (1)
C. A. 5th Cir.
Certiorari denied.