green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“t is clear that prior notice and hearing is not required to tow illegally parked cars.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fields v. State
t is clear that prior notice and hearing is not required to tow illegally parked cars.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jackson Court Condominiums, Inc. v. City of New Orleans
Ct. 332, 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Corkery v. Texas Christian University
See Breath v. Cronvich, 729 F.2d 1006, 1010-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William C. Miller, A/K/A Chris Miller A/K/A William Bond
See United States v. Palumbo, 735 F.2d 1095, 1097 (8th Cir.), (officers were justified in looking behind drawer of dresser which was in arm’s reach of unhand-cuffed defendant), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Javier Valencia and Ivan Dario Martinez-Valencia
See United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1143 (7th Cir.) (rejecting defendant’s misplaced reliance on Barclay and stating that a failure to give a separate instruction on specific intent is not reversible error so long as the court’s other instructions sufficiently define the required mental state), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); United States v. Arambasich, 597 F.2d 609, 611-14 (7th Cir.1979) (similarly rejecting defendant’s misplaced reliance on Barclay and criticizing the use of stock "specific intent” and "general intent’’ instructions as …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Clement
(2×)
In the instant case, however, the district court endorsed the Magistrate's finding that Clement could reasonably be supposed to "take warning from the delay in [Stephenson and McDade's] return and the scurrying heard by the officers while outside room justified a fear that evidence would be destroyed." Knobeloch, 746 F.2d at 1367 ; see United States v. Palumbo, 735 F.2d 1095, 1097 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984). 26 In United States v. Beck, 662 F.2d 527, 530 (8th Cir.1981), we had serious doubts that the necessary exigent circumstances existed.
discussed
Cited "see"
The United States of America v. Moises Otero
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1146 (7th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wells
(2×)
State v. Harrison, 805 P.2d 769, 784-85 (Utah App.), cert. denied, 817 P.2d 327 (Utah 1991); see also United States v. Palumbo, 735 F.2d 1095, 1097 (8th Cir.) (stating that area of immediate control "is not constrained because the arrestee is unlikely at the time of the arrest to actually reach into that area"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); Ricks v. State, 82 Md.App. 369 , 571 A.2d 887, 891 (1990) (noting that "the area deemed to be within an arrestee's reach, lunge or grasp is broad" and is not necessarily limited by "apparent obstacles inhibiting an arr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, United States of America, State of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Shale Processors, Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Breath v. Cronvich, 729 F.2d 1006, 1011 (5th Cir.), modified by, 734 F.2d 225 , cert. denied, 469 U.S, 934, 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bass, 619 F.2d 1057, 1077 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fair v. City of Galveston
LeFlore v. Robinson, 434 F.2d 933, 949 (5th Cir.1970) (stating that Lambert does not permit facial challenges to state laws based on lack of notice), vacated on other grounds, 446 F.2d 715 (5th Cir.1971); see also Breath v. Cronvich, 729 F.2d 1006 , 1012 n. 5 (5th Cir.) (stating that “Lambert’s application ... has been limited to criminal cases”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 934 , 105 S.Ct. 332 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Wayde Mealy and Lance B. Spotts
See Walsh v. Mellas, 837 F.2d 789, 799-800 (7th Cir.1988) (failure to press an argument either before the district court or on appeal results in waiver); see also United States v. Brown, 739 F.2d 1136, 1144-45 (7th Cir.) (appellate court may refuse to consider an ineffective assistance of counsel claim if the claim was not first raised before the *910 district court and the record on appeal is not sufficient for the court to rule on the merits of the claim), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 933 , 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Palumbo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-422.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Louisiana (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.