Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 473 U.S. 903 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 473 U.S. 903 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wallace v. State (oklacrimapp, 1997-03-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wallace v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
As the materials provided by Petitioner state, “[t]his change added about one-fifth of a square mile to the area of Arkansas.” (Exh. 23). “[T]he disputed tract became part of the State of Arkansas in 1905 by the joint action of the Congress of the United States and the State of Arkansas, and remains so to this day.” Id. at 612, 105 S.Ct. at 3521. (5) The opinion also states: The parties stipulated that the State of Arkansas has exercised continuous sovereignty, dominion, control, and exclusive criminal and civil jurisdiction over the disputed tract since the enactment of Act No. II by …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
v.
Zenith Radio Corp.
No. 83-2004.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 1, 1985.
473 U.S. 903
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certio-rari granted, 471 U. S. 1002.] Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted and counsel shall file with the Clerk nine copies of the record that was before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami-cus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.