green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…counsel who puts the burden of study and illumination on the defendants or the court must expect to pay attorneys' fees under
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Vandeventer v. Wabash National Corp.
an empty head but a pure heart is no defense. the rule requires counsel to read and consider before litigating____ it is not acceptable to make an assertion of law and hope that it will turn out to be true.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brandt v. Schal Associates, Inc.
counsel who puts the burden of study and illumination on the defendants or the court must expect to pay attorneys' fees under
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brandt v. Schal Associates, Incorporated
counsel who puts the burden of study and illumination on the defendants or the court must expect to pay attorneys' fees under
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Engesser
(2×)
See United States v. Guinan, 836 F.2d 350, 354 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1218 , 108 S.Ct. 2871 , 101 L.Ed.2d 907 (1988) (quoting United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 659 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986)). [¶ 39.] Hearsay generally does not qualify as admissible evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania
See Neumann v. Reinforced Earth Co., 786 F.2d 424, 428 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 181 , 93 L.Ed.2d 116 (1986); see also Fineman, 980 F.2d at 201 . 20 Plaintiffs argue that where there is high degree of predatory conduct coupled with a transparent intent to monopolize, the courts have required a less rigorous showing of market power.
cited
Cited "see"
Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania
See Neumann v. Reinforced Earth Co., 786 F.2d 424, 428 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 181 , 93 L.Ed.2d 116 (1986); see also Fineman, 980 F.2d at 201 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick T. Boulware, Jr., M.D. v. State Of Nevada
See Pub.L. 99-660, Title VII, § 701(a), 100 Stat. 3799 3 This interpretation is arguably supported by dicta in Rickards v. Canine Eye Registration Found., 783 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 180 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc.
See Rickards v. Canine Eye Registration Foundation, Inc., 783 F.2d 1329, 1332, 1335 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 180 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986) (to establish a violation of Sherman Act sections 1 or 2, an antitrust plaintiff must establish the element of “causal antitrust injury”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc.
See Rickards v. Canine Eye Registration Foundation, Inc., 783 F.2d 1329, 1332, 1335 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 180 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986) (to establish a violation of Sherman Act sections 1 or 2, an antitrust plaintiff must establish the element of "causal antitrust injury").
cited
Cited "see"
Oxfurth v. Siemens A.G.
See Thornton v. Wahl, 787 F.2d 1151, 1154 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 181 , 93 L.Ed.2d 116 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Bhan v. Nme Hospitals, Inc.
See Rickards v. Canine Eye Registration Found., 783 F.2d 1329 , 1332 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 180 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc.
See Rickards v. Canine Eye Registration Found., 783 F.2d 1329 , 1332 (9th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 180 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Fuller
See United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 660 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curley v. Brignoli Curley & Roberts, Associates
See Thornton v. Wahl, 787 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 181 , 93 L.Ed.2d 116 (1986) ("Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 provides that every pleading or ‘other paper’ — a term that includes notices of appeal and appellate briefs — shall be signed ...”). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 659 (7th Cir.) (that declarant told several persons, including two disinterested third parties, about threats lent credibility to fact that declarant had stated he had been threatened), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. Pixley
See United States v. Guinan, 836 F.2d 350, 354 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2871 , 101 L.Ed.2d 907 (1988) (quoting United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 659 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Marshall
See United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 659 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Colon-Miranda
See e.g., United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651, 659 (7th Cir.) (implicitly acknowledging corroborative evidence as relevant to the determination of trustworthiness), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986); United States v. Boulahanis, 677 F.2d 586, 588 (7th Cir.), (allowing tape of conversation and testimony of eyewitnesses to corroborate admission of grand jury testimony), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 375 , 74 L.Ed.2d 509 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rawlings v. Iowa Department of Human Services
Compare Harris v. Missouri Court of Appeals, 787 F.2d 427, 429 (8th Cir.) (Missouri court of appeals is not a "person” despite Monell), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986) with Della Grotta v. Rhode Island, 781 F.2d 343 (1st Cir.1986) (states are "persons" after Monell).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Doe, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
Moffett v. McCauley, 724 F.2d 581, 583 (7th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986); United States v. Howard, 744 F.2d 838, 845 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ferrey
See, e.g., United States v. Vretta, 790 F.2d 651 (7th Cir.) (impact of Inadi need not be decided because the declarant of the hearsay detailing prior threats was the deceased victim and was obviously unavailable) 9 , ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 179 , 93 L.Ed.2d 115 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hardie
v.
Hardie
v.
Hardie
No. 86-99.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2) · N.D. Indiana (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.