green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: Durning v. First Boston Corp. ↗
Issue: double jeopardy clauseNJ ↗
Issue: federal double jeopardy clauseNJ ↗
Issue: missing witness instructionDC ↗
Issue: speedy trial claimDC ↗
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.4 score
“the dan e. mcmahon was under construction on land at the time of richendollar's accident. it was not a vessel within the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts under the long-standing jurisdictional rubric ...”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gomez v. Winslow
attached documents are part of the complaint and may be considered in determining whether the plaintiff can prove any set of facts in support of the claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Efferson v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
the sine qua non of 905(b) statutory liability for vessel negligence is the presence of a vessel which admiralty regards as a separate entity distinct from its owner.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Company, Inc. v. C.N. Lloyd Brasileiro, the Hartford Insurance Company of Alabama, in Personam
the dan e. mcmahon was under construction on land at the time of richendollar's accident. it was not a vessel within the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts under the long-standing jurisdictional rubric ...
cited
Cited "see"
Embury v. King
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stanton
See State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98, 111 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rodriguez
The classification is in no sense illusory; it has reference to the safeguards inherent in the very nature of the offense, the punitive quality that characterizes the proceeding, and the requirements of fundamental fairness and essential justice to the accused." Id. at 303, 135 A. 2d 859 . [5] The Dively court also ruled that motor vehicle violations tried in municipal courts qualified as "within the category of offenses subject to the Double Jeopardy Clause." 92 N.J. at 586 , 458 A. 2d 502 ; see State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98 , 527 A. 2d 1355 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cartagena-Carrasquillo
See United States v. Marrapese, 826 F.2d 145, 149 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Snellbaker
See generally, State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98 , 527 A. 2d 1355 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 358 (1987); State v. Dively, 92 N.J. 573 , 458 A. 2d 502 (1983); State v. Capak, 271 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonnette v. Shell Offshore, Inc.
Fraudulent Joinder A claim under LHWCA § 5(b) “must be predicated on facts warranting the invocation of admiralty jurisdiction.” Shea v. Rev-Lyn Contracting Co., Inc., 868 F.2d 515, 517 (1st Cir.1989) (citing Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1007 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1126 , 106 S.Ct. 1994 , 90 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986)); May v. Transworld Drilling Co., 786 F.2d 1261, 1264 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 854 , 107 S.Ct. 190 , 93 L.Ed.2d 123 (1986) (“Following prior Fifth Circuit precedent and the recent First Circuit decision in Drake v. Raymark Industries, …
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Verifone Securities Litigation. Martin Halkin Michael Minichino Lois Steen Richard Marchesi David J. Steinberg Chaille Steinberg v. Verifone Inc. Robertson Stephens, Robertson Stephens and Company, Martin Halkin Michael Minichino Lois Steen Richard Marchesi David J. Steinberg Chaille Steinberg v. Verifone Inc. William F. Gorog John R.C. Porter Keith B. Greeslin H.H. Haight, IV William N. Melton Frank J. Caufield Hatim A. Tyabji Morgan Stanley & Co. Robertson Stephens Dean Witter Reynolds Incorporated Burton McMurtry
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1268 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). 13 * Shareholders argue that VeriFone and the Underwriters concealed adverse facts in order to complete VeriFone's public offering.
discussed
Cited "see"
Halkin v. VeriFone Inc.
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1268 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). 1 Shareholders argue that VeriFone and the Underwriters concealed adverse facts in order to complete VeriFone’s public offering.
cited
Cited "see"
Durning v. Citibank, International
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jean C. Durning Marvin B. Durning, United States Attorney General, Intervenor v. Citibank, International the First Boston Corp. First Interstate Wyoming Community Development Authority, Jean C. Durning Marvin B. Durning, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, United States Attorney General, Intervenor v. The First Boston Corp. Citibank, N.A. First Interstate First Interstate of Casper Wyoming Community Development Authority
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). 8 Following remand, the district court granted motions to dismiss on a variety of grounds.
discussed
Cited "see"
LePrince v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund
See State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98, 101-02 , 527 A.2d 1355 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987) (New Jersey’s double jeopardy protection is co-extensive with federal constitution).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fogarty
(2×)
See State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98 , 527 A.2d 1355 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987) (prohibition against double jeopardy applies to DWI cases); State v. Tropea, 78 N.J. 309 , 316, 394 A.2d 355 (1978) (in motor-vehicle offenses considerations of fundamental fairness bar retrial because of insufficiency of evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard W. Young
See United States v. Marrapese, 826 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dianne Sutherland, United States of America v. Alan W. Fini
See United States v. Marrapese, 826 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); United States v. Bassford, 812 F.2d 16, 20 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 1909 , 95 L.Ed.2d 514 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ozzello v. Peterson Builders, Inc.
(2×)
See Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc., 819 F.2d 124, 125 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987);.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Blow
See State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98, 102 , cert. den., 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 358 (1987); State v. Barnes, 84 N.J. 362, 370 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Rosa
See United States v. Marrapese, 826 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United States of America v. Angel Rivera-Feliciano, A/K/A Junior Azuquita, United States of America v. Victor Carrera-Perez, A/K/A Paye, United States of America v. Eduardo Rivera-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Heredia Nieves, A/K/A Checo El Perro
See United States v. Marrapese, 826 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Cooper/T. Smith Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 819 F.2d 124, 125 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bailey v. United States
See German v. United States, 525 A.2d 596, 611 (D.C.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Miles v. United States, 483 A.2d 649, 658 (D.C.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Forbes v. a & P Boat Rentals, Inc.
See Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 784 F.2d 580, 588 (5th Cir. 1986), reh'g en banc on other grounds, 819 F.2d 124 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1268 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Admiralty Fund v. Hugh Johnson & Co., 677 F.2d 1301, 1306 (9th Cir.1982); cf. Associated Builders, 505 F.2d at 98 (holding that district court was correct to grant defendant's motion to dismiss where a reasonable fact-finder could not find that a prospectus that plaintiff appended to the complaint was misleading).
discussed
Cited "see"
Isquith ex rel. Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1268 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Admiralty Fund v. Hugh Johnson & Co., 677 F.2d 1301, 1306 (9th Cir.1982); cf. Associated Builders, 505 F.2d at 98 (holding that district court was correct to grant defendant’s motion to dismiss where a reasonable fact-finder could not find that a prospectus that plaintiff appended to the complaint was misleading).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Scop, Raphael Bloom, Herbert Stone and Jack Ringer
(2×)
As we have frequently noted, a defendant bringing an insufficiency challenge "bears a 'very heavy burden,' " United States v. Buck, 804 F.2d 239, 242 (2d Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Davis, 767 F.2d 1025, 1040 (2d Cir.1985)), and we must uphold the jury's guilty verdict if, "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); accord United States v. Worthington, 822 F.2d 31…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Baumann
See also, similarly so holding in respect of death by auto and DWI, State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98 , 527 A. 2d 1355 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 358 (1987); State v. Devlin, 234 N.J.Super. 545, 553 , 561 A. 2d 280 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 117 N.J. 653 , 569 A. 2d 1348 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffin v. State
Id. at (b)(7). [8] The rule is analogous to that articulated in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 89 S.Ct. 2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), later limited in Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794 , 109 S.Ct. 2201 , 104 L.Ed.2d 865 (1989). [1] United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368, 371 , 102 S.Ct. 2485, 2487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 74 (1982). [2] North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 723-26 , 89 S.Ct. 2072, 2080-81 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); see also Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct. 2098 , 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974) (applying same rule when the defendant received an increased sentence for a felony conv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Givens v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., German v. United States, 525 A.2d 596 (D.C.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Ford v. United States, 396 A.2d 191 (D.C.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Capak
See also State v. DeLuca, 108 N.J. 98 , 527 A. 2d 1355 (1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 358 (1987); State v. Dively, 92 N.J. 573 , 458 A. 2d 502 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. United States
(2×)
We have emphasized that the trial court must first determine both "that the witness in question is peculiarly available to the party against whom the inference is sought, and ... that the witness' testimony would have elucidated the transaction at issue." Lemon v. United States, 564 A.2d 1368, 1375 (D.C.1989) (quoting Lawson v. United States, 514 A.2d 787, 789 (D.C.1986)); see also German v. United States, 525 A.2d 596, 611 (D.C.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Thomas v. United States, 447 A.2d 52, 57 (D.C.1982); Conyers v. United States, 309 A.2d 309, 312…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Hollywood Marine
Id., at pp. 2-3; see also Belcher Exhibit 18, pictures of plaintiffs injuries taken in February 1988. . 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ; see also Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., Inc., 819 F.2d 124, 127 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); Christoff v. Bergeron Industries, Inc., 748 F.2d 297, 298 (5th Cir.1984); Parker v. South Louisiana Contractors, Inc., 537 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sherman Wayne Swearingen
See also United States v. Worthington, 822 F.2d 315, 318-319 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 331 [ 98 L.Ed.2d 358 ] (1987) (sustaining conviction for false statement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 where the defendant drew a check on a fictitious bank, since the check was designedly untrue).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wyoming Community Development Authority
v.
Durning et ux.
v.
Durning et ux.
No. 87-487.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1987.
484 U.S. 944
1987 U.S. LEXIS 4651
Cited by 165 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.