green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hurd v. United States
See Furka v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 824 F.2d 330, 332 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Berg v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 759 F.2d 1425, 1430 (9th Cir.1985); Korpi v. United States, 961 F.Supp. 1335, 1347 (N.D.Cal. 1997), aff'd, 145 F.3d 1338 , 1998 WL 231207 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. United States
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454-55 , amended, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); see also Southern Pacific Transp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carson Harbor Village Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park v. City of Carson, a Municipal Corporation
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1455 n. 6 (9th Cir.) (quoting MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340 , 353 n. 8, 106 S.Ct. 2561, 2568 , 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986)), modified on other grounds, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Continental Leavitt Communications, Ltd. v. Painewebber, Inc.
See Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1565 (7th Cir.1987) (discussing standard for the tort), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Picard v. Bay Area Regional Transit District
Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567 , 569 n. 1 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989); see Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1456 (9th Cir.1987), modified in other respects, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988) (procedural due process claim found not to be ripe because substantive due process claim was not ripe).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Pig Stands, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hard Rock Cafe International, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Texas Pig Stands, Inc. v. Hard Rock Cafe International, Inc.
See Greycas v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1567 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988) (holding that civil judgments are not "usable in subsequent proceedings as evidence of the facts underlying the judgment; for as to those facts, the judgment is hearsay").
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Pig Stands, Inc. v. Hard Rock Cafe International, Inc.
See Greycas v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1567 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988) (holding that civil judgments are not “usable in subsequent proceedings as evidence of the facts underlying the judgment; for as to those facts, the judgment is hearsay”).
cited
Cited "see"
Traweek v. City and County of San Francisco
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1453 n. 4 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Traweek v. City & County of San Francisco
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1453 n. 4 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. City Of Los Angeles
(2×)
See Pennell, 485 U.S. at 11 n. 5, 108 S.Ct. at 857 n. 5; Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi Valley, 882 F.2d 1398, 1404 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 493 (1990); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of Los Angeles
(2×)
See Pennell, 485 U.S. at 11 n. 5, 108 S.Ct. at 857 n. 5; Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass’n v. City of Simi Valley, 882 F.2d 1398, 1404 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 493 (1990); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Unity Ventures v. County Of Lake
We also noted in Unity Ventures that the Ninth Circuit, drawing upon Yolo County and Williamson County, applied the Court's takings analysis to claims involving equal protection and substantive due process: "In Kinzli, we interpreted Williamson and MacDonald to require a final decision by the government which inflicts a concrete harm upon the plaintiff landowner." Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989); see Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir.1987), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see"
Unity Ventures v. County of Lake
We also noted in Unity Ventures that the Ninth Circuit, drawing upon Yolo County and Williamson County, applied the Court’s takings analysis to claims involving equal protection and substantive due process: “In Kinzli, we interpreted Williamson and MacDonald to require a final decision by the government which inflicts a concrete harm upon the plaintiff landowner.” Her rington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488 , 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (emphasis in original), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989); see Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir.1987), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
Landmark Land Company Of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Buchanan
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 , Amended by 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141 , 1146 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Buchanan
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 , Amended by 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141 , 1146 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crossland Savings FSB v. Rockwood Insurance
(2×)
See Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560 (7th Cir.1987) (attorney liable under Illinois law for opinion letter addressed to plaintiff and prepared pursuant to the terms of a loan agreement), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988); Haberman v. Public Power Supply System, 109 Wash.2d 107 , 744 P.2d 1032 , 1067-68 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd Enright v. Asclepius Panacea, LLC Asclepius Panacea GP, LLC Daily Pharmacy, LLC Daily Pharmacy GP, LLC And Toth Enterprises II, P .A. D/B/A Victory Medical Center
See, e.g., Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560 , 1564–65 (7th Cir.1987)(applying Illinois law and concluding that an attorney owed a lender a duty to reveal the borrower's true financial status), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988); Menuskin v. Williams, 145 F.3d 755, 760 (6th Cir.1998)(applying Tennessee law and holding that the attorney of a title insurance company who prepared warranty deeds on property bought by the plaintiff, stating that the property was free of all liens and encumbrances, might be liable if the plaintiff reasonably relied on the warra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Credit Union Central Falls v. Groff
See, e.g., Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1565 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988) (attorney who supplied opinion letter to lender in furtherance of client/borrower's loan application liable for misrepresentations); Century 21 Deep South Properties, Ltd. v. Corson, 612 So.2d 359, 374 (Miss.1992) (modifying "the requirements of legal malpractice actions based on an attorney’s negligence in performing title work by abolishing the requirement of attorney-client relationship and extending liability to foreseeable third parties who detriment…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.
See, e.g., Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1564-65 (7th Cir.1987)(applying Illinois law and concluding that an attorney owed a lender a duty to reveal the borrower's true financial status), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988); Menuskin v. Williams, 145 F.3d 755, 760 (6th Cir.1998)(applying Tennessee law and holding that the attorney of a title insurance company who prepared warranty deeds on property bought by the plaintiff, stating that the property was free of all liens and encumbrances, might be liable if the plaintiff reasonably relied on the warranty…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership v. Dames & Moore, Inc.
(2×)
Putting aside the breach of contract claim, liability for negligent misrepresentation under Illinois law 1 exists "when one, in the course of his business, negligently supplies information to another who suffers harm in reliance on the information." Perschall v. Raney, 137 Ill.App.3d 978 , 92 Ill.Dec. 431, 434 , 484 N.E.2d 1286, 1289 (4th Dist.1985); see also Greycas, Inc. v. Proud, 826 F.2d 1560, 1565 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 862 (1988); Duhl v. Nash Realty, Inc., 102 Ill.App.3d 483 , 57 Ill.Dec. 904, 912-13 , 429 N.E.2d 1267, 1275-76 (1st Dist.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Celentano v. City of West Haven
Similarly, “only when [the property owner] receives a ‘ “final definitive [decision] regarding how [the local agency] will apply the regulations” ’ to [the property in issue] will the district court be able to review ‘the alleged dissimilar treatment accorded similarly situated landowners.’ ” Landmark Land Co., Inc. v. Buchanan, 874 F.2d 717 , 722 (10th Cir.1989) (quoting Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989)) (citations omitted); see also Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 144…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casalino v. Ente Ferrovie Dello Stato
Courts considering a claim for personal injuries sustained in a foreign state have consistently held that the continued physical suffering and consequential damages that persisted once the plaintiff returned to the United States did not meet the Act’s requirement of “a direct effect in the United States.” See Martin v. Republic of South Africa, 836 F.2d 91, 95 (2d Cir.1987) (no “direct effect” where injury occurred in South Africa, *342 causing American citizen to return to United States permanently disabled and subject to continuing medical care); see also Zernicek v. Brown & Root, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dwight G. Nelson v. City of Selma
The council’s action rejecting the proposed project and limiting density to R-l, single family, constituted “a final and authoritative determination of the type and intensity of development legally permitted on the subject property.” See MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340, 348 , 106 S.Ct. 2561, 2566 , 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986); see also Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1987), amended on other grounds, 830 F.2d 968 (1987), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States
E.g., Culebras Enter.’s Corp. v. Rivera Rios, 813 F.2d 506, 515 (1st Cir.1987); Lit- tlefield v. City of Afton, 785 F.2d 596 , 609 (8th Cir.1986); see also, e.g., Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 (9th Cir.1987) (plaintiff was generally required to seek a variance from permit denial by the city, but was not required to seek the variance where that application would be futile), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 816 F.2d 1514, 1515 (11th Cir.1987) (plaintiff was generally required to seek a variance from a permit …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kinzli
v.
City of Santa Cruz
v.
City of Santa Cruz
No. 87-912.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1988.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.