Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact.”
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Interlink Data Network of Los Angeles, Inc., 77 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 1996).published“The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact.”
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,048 v. Interlink Data Network of Los Angeles, Inc. Interlink Fiber Optic Partners L.P. Interlink Video Phone Partners L.P. Michael Gartner, 77 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 1996).published“The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact.”
Other citing cases
- Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455 (1990).published
- Hector Pacheco v. Ralph Diaz, No. 2:21-cv-07951 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2021).
- (PC) Pacheco v. Diaz, No. 2:20-cv-02508 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2021).
Shimoda, Administrator, Oahu Community Correctional Center
v.
Akao
v.
Akao
No. 87-1343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1988.
Published opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.