green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
“money launderers play an essential part in a conspiracy”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Martin A. \Marty\" Sax
money launderers play an essential part in a conspiracy
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morrow
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edelin
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1414 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hsia
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trie
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 *24 F.2d 1384, 1414 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198-99 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988) (hearing required “only when the claims cannot be disposed of by resort to the files and record”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); see also United States v. Stuart, 718 F.2d 931 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that defendant "opened the door" to prior consistent statement by using portions of that statement on cross-examination).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (“statements made by the defendant” does not include co-conspirator statements, even if those statements can be attributed to the defendant for the purposes of the hearsay rule); United States v. Roberts, 811 F.2d 257 (4th Cir.1987) (plain language of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) pertains to discovery of statements made by defendant, and rule does not mention, nor was it intended to apply to, discovery of statements made by co-conspirators).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
White Indus. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 611 F.Supp. 1049, 1069-70 (W.D.Mo.1985); see United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Vence v. United States, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Possick, 849 F.2d at 339 ; United States v. Gardner, 611 F.2d 770, 776 (9th Cir.1980); Scales, 594 F.2d at 563-64 ; Smyth, 556 F.2d at 1182-84 ; accord United States v. Goichman, 407 F.Supp. 980, 998 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 547 F.2d 778 (3d Cir.1976); Bader Coal Co. v. Quemahoning Coal Co., 14 F.2d 743, 747 (3d Cir.1926).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Harvey Myerson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 936 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); see United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1405 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 , 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988). 113 We conclude, however, that the district court applied an overly narrow definition of "new matter." The district court interpreted the standard to preclude recross if the questions fell within an "area" or "subject matter" for which cross-examination had previously been available.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. United States
Id.; see Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.) (appellant barred from raising on collateral attack matters which could have been raised on direct appeal), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); see United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1405 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 , 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor M. Rivera and Mario Heredia, AKA \Nacho
Accord United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1418 (D.C.Cir.) (declining to require discovery of coconspirator statement absent Constitutional or statutory authority and citing cases in agreement), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
David J. Wilson v. Gary McCaughtry
See United States v. Zukowski, 851 F.2d 174 (1988), certiorari denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (one-year delay); United States v. Fuesting, 845 F.2d 664 (1988) (less than one-year delay); United States v. L’Allier, 838 F.2d 234 (1988) (sixteen-month delay); United States v. Rein, 848 F.2d 777, 781 (1988) (less than one-year delay); United States v. Antonio, 830 F.2d 798 (1987) (three-year delay); United States v. Williams, 738 F.2d 172 (1984) (four-year delay); United States v. Solomon, 688 F.2d 1171 (1982) (three-year delay).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone Derr
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1407 (D.C.Cir.) (where defense counsel was given opportunity to, and did, question witness about important aspects of plea bargain, restrictions on questioning as to that source of bias were permissible), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 *1335 L.Ed.2d 83 (1988) (appellant Burns), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (appellant Tarantino); see also United States v. Foster, 982 F.2d 551, 553 (D.C.Cir.1993) (where defense had effectively conveyed inconsistencies in witness’ statements, preclusion of fu…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael W. Beauchamp
(4×)
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1409 (D.C.Cir.) (“The ‘specific contradiction’ rule ... is a particular instance of the trial court’s general power under Fed.R.Evid. 403 to exclude evidence ‘if its probative value is substantially outweighed ... by considerations of undue delay, [or] waste of time.’ ”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Pisan, 636 F.2d at 858 ; 3 Weinstein’s Evidence, 607[5], at 607-79, -80 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Luchie v. United States
“If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice ... that course should be followed.” Id. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 ; accord Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Chapman and Jack E. Wright
See United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 320-21 , 92 S.Ct. 455, 463-64 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971); accord United States v. Zukowski, 851 F.2d 174, 178 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Turkish, 623 F.2d 769, 772-74 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077 , 101 S.Ct. 856 , 66 L.Ed.2d 800 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Turkish, 623 F.2d 769, 772-74 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077 , 101 S.Ct. 856 , 66 L.Ed.2d 800 (1981). 19 The panel's ruling also creates serious problems for the Government in the development of evidence at the grand jury.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrzej Derezinski
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1403-04 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beale
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (activities of conspirator unrelated to the aims of the conspiracy not attributable to co-conspirators); United States v. Koopmans, 757 F.2d 901, 905 (7th Cir.1985) (statement by declarant who terminated his involvement in a conspiracy not admissible against a defendant who joined the conspiracy after declarant had left).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beale
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (activities of conspirator unrelated to the aims of the conspiracy not attributable to co-conspirators); United States v. Koopmans, 757 F.2d 901, 905 (7th Cir.1985) (statement by declarant who terminated his involvement in a conspiracy not admissible against a defendant who joined the conspiracy after declarant had left).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James North
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1393 (D.C.Cir.) (where conduct of a co-conspirator is unrelated to the aims of the overall conspiracy it may not be attributed to other co-conspirators), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James North
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1393 (D.C.Cir.) (where conduct of a co-con-spiratór is unrelated to the aims of the overall conspiracy it may not be attributed to other co-conspirators), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney Strokes
See U.S. v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1419 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 174 (1988); U.S. v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 311-15 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988) (it is for the jury to determine the credibility of a compensated witness).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coldwell
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Bollinger, 796 F.2d 1394 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1737 , 100 L.Ed.2d 200 (1988); United States v. Metz, 608 F.2d 147 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 80 , 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Forga Coldwell, United States of America v. James Douglas Wilson, United States of America v. Andrew Forga Coldwell, United States of America v. James Douglas Wilson
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Bollinger, 796 F.2d 1394 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1737 , 100 L.Ed.2d 200 (1988); United States v. Metz, 608 F.2d 147 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 80 , 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. Pixley
See United States v. Zukowski, 851 F.2d 174, 178-79 (7th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988); United States v. Eckhardt, 843 F.2d 989, 994-95 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 106 , 102 L.Ed.2d 81 (1988); United States v. L'Allier, 838 F.2d 234, 238 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Valona, 834 F.2d 1334, 1337-38 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Wellman, 830 F.2d 1453, 1459-60 (7th Cir.1987); see also United States v. Chappell, 854 F.2d 190, 195 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Rein, 848 F.2d 777, 781 (7th Cir.1988) (due process violation established…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice Sacharczyk
See United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1404 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Cameo Convalescent Center v. Senn, 738 F.2d 836 , 844 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1106 , 105 S.Ct. 780 , 83 L.Ed.2d 775 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. United States
Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 ; see also Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. United States
Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 ; see also Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Spencer v. United States
See, e.g., Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Manuel Melendez
See United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 18 , 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1048 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985); Modica, 663 F.2d at 1179 ; see also United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 936 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hutchison
See e.g., United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 , 1411-3 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988), appeal from rem., 905 F.2d 458 (1990); United States v. Snider, 720 F.2d 985, 992 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1107 , 104 S.Ct. 1613 , 80 L.Ed.2d 142 (1984) ("To be admissible, the statements must somehow advance the objectives of the conspiracy, not merely inform the listener of the declarant's activities.”) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
Hammad, 858 F.2d at 838-39 ; see also United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. United States
Compare Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198-99 (D.C.) ("movant is entitled to a hearing on his [or her] claims regarding the ineffective assistance of trial counsel only when the claims cannot be disposed of by resort to the files and records of the case because the claims involve matters outside of the record"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988), with (Cleveland) Wright v. United States, 608 A.2d 763, 766 (D.C.1992) (“To uphold the denial of a § 23-110 motion without a hearing, this court must conclude that under no circumstances could the movant…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. United States
See also Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. United States
The judge ruled that the “defendant fail[ed] to establish any significant acts or omissions which were outside the range of professional competence or any errors which, but for those errors, would produce a different result.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Ellerbe v. United States, 545 A.2d 1197, 1198 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 868 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 144 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel W. Robinson, Dillard E. Woods, and Paul E. Robinson
See also United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1391 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 , 109 S.Ct. 108 , 102 L.Ed.2d 83 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 867 , 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988) (holding that a “verdict must be upheld if the evidence adequately supports a finding that a single conspiracy existed.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
See, e.g., United States v. Pinto, 850 F.2d 927, 932 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); Hooks, 848 F.2d at 799 ; United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 891 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Morrison, 535 F.2d 223, 229 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Alan \Jamie\" Vigliatura"
See, e.g., United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384, 1405 (D.C.Cir.1988) (failure to instruct not plain error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 174 , 102 L.Ed.2d 143 (1988); United States v. Edwards, 716 F.2d 822, 825 (11th Cir.1983) (rehabilitation on cross-examination), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tarantino
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5361.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.