Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 492 U.S. 927 (1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 492 U.S. 927 (1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
191 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bower v. Texas (scotus, 2015-03-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bower v. Texas
SCOTUS · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. Texas, 769 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989); Ex parte Bower, 823 S.W.2d 284 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 835 , 113 S.Ct. 107 , 121 L.Ed.2d 66 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Martinez v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989). 11 .
discussed Cited "see" Leonard L. Martinez, Sr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fearance v. State, 771 S.W .2d 486, 509 (Tex.Crim .App. 1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 326 , 196 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989). 11 The continuation of a tem porary detention m ay be justified by efforts to determ ine whether the victim or a witness can identify the suspect.
discussed Cited "see" Leonard L. Martinez, Sr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fearance v. State , 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex.Crim.App. 1988), cert. denied , 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 326 , 196 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989). 11: The continuation of a temporary detention may be justified by efforts to determine whether the victim or a witness can identify the suspect.
discussed Cited "see" Castro v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 980 , 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citing Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cer t. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989)).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
Gates, 462 U.S. at 236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2331 ; see Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 902 (Tex.Crim.App.) (holding we do not conduct a de novo review but look to the evidence as a whole and determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the magistrate's decision), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 , 685 n. 6 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 11 .
cited Cited "see" Bower v. Quarterman
5th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. State of Texas, 769 S.W.2d 887 (Tex. Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" Matthews v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-55 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2032 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). [12] State v. Johnson, 896 S.W.2d 277, 285 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995), aff'd, 939 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); see United States v. Phillips, 382 F.3d 489, 494 (5th Cir.2004) (noting that "[w]hether a defendant has standing to contest an allegedly illegal search is a question of law" and is reviewed de novo ); United States v. DeLuca, 269 F.3d 1128, 1131 (10th Cir.2001) (stating that courts review de novo the issue of whether a defendant has standing to challenge a search). [13] State v. …
discussed Cited "see" Davis v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2331 ; see Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 902 (Tex.Crim.App.) (holding we do not conduct a de novo review but look to the evidence as a whole and determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the magistrate’s decision), cert, denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 , 685 n. 6 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); see also Cates, 120 S.W.3d at 355 n. 3 (recognizing that before a Franks hearing may be held, defendant must make a substantial preliminary showing of falsity in the "four com…
discussed Cited "see" Davis v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 236 , 103 S.Ct. at 2331 ; see Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 902 (Tex.Crim.App.) (holding we do not conduct a de novo review but look to the evidence as a whole and determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the magistrate’s decision), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989), overruled on other grounds by Heitman, 815 S.W.2d at 685 n. 6; see also Cates, 120 S.W.3d at 355 n. 3 (recognizing that before a Franks hearing may be held, defendant must make a substantial preliminary showing of falsity in the “four corners” of the probable caus…
cited Cited "see" Ladd v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 514 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jennings
Tex. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 609 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989) (acknowledging that an officer may rely upon information relayed to him by other officers and the sum of information known to those cooperating with him).
discussed Cited "see" Hunter v. State
Tex. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 906-907 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989), overruled on other grounds, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (wherein the boilerplate instruction to disregard was enough to cure the prejudice of an improper comment).
discussed Cited "see" Dillard v. State
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 895 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989), overruled on other grounds by Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
discussed Cited "see" Garcia v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See more recently, Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 906 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989). .
discussed Cited "see" Hill v. Chemical Bank
D. Minnesota · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989) (finding complete preemption under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188 ).
discussed Cited "see" Scott Davies v. American Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 , 1087 (8th Cir.) (distinguishing Lingle), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989); Beard v. Carrollton R.R., 893 F.2d 117, 122 (6th Cir.1989) (same); McCall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 844 F.2d 294, 304 (6th Cir.) (Or *467 der on Rehearing) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 879 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988); Leu v. Norfolk & W.Ry., 820 F.2d 825, 830 (7th Cir.1987) (The “reasoning [of a pre-Lingle LMRA case] is equally applicable to the determination of whether a claim couched in terms of a state tort law actually …
cited Cited "see" Allen v. United Transportation Union
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 , 1085 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989).
cited Cited "see" Allen v. United Transportation Union
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 , 1085 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989).
cited Cited "see" Bernard v. State
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cedarapids, Inc. v. Chicago, Central & Pacific Railroad
N.D. Iowa · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080, 1084 (8th Cir.) (holding that complete preemption “prohibits a plaintiff from defeating removal by failing to plead necessary federal questions in complaint”), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Borsari v. State
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 902 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989) and overruled on other grounds by Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stephen H. Peters v. Union Pacific RR
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc., 58 F.3d 1238, 1242 (8th Cir. 1995) (citing Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393 (1987)); see also Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 , 1084 (8th Cir.) (complete preemption "prohibits a plaintiff from defeating removal by failing to plead necessary federal questions in a complaint"), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stephen H. Peters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc., 58 F.3d 1238, 1242 (8th Cir.1995) (citing Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393 , 107 S.Ct. 2425, 2430 , 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987)); see also Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080 , 1084 (8th Cir.) (complete preemption “prohibits a plaintiff from defeating removal by failing to plead necessary federal questions in a complaint”), *261 cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of Extradition of Lin
D. Guam · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d 776, 782-783 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 271 , 93 L.Ed.2d 247 (1986); See also Oen Yin-Choy v. Robinson, 858 F.2d 1400 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1106 , 109 S.Ct. 3157 , 104 *209 L.Ed.2d 1020, reh. denied, 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3267 , 106 L.Ed.2d 612 (1988).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Robert D. Freeman v. State of Idaho
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Oen Yin-Choy v. Robinson, 858 F.2d 1400, 1408 (CA9 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1106 , reh. denied, 492 U.S. 927 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deford
v.
Soo Line Railroad Co.
No. 88-1824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 3, 1989.
492 U.S. 927
Consideration, Took.
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.