green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“a conspiracy to rig bids may be an agreement among competitors about ... who should be the successful bidder ... or who should refrain from bidding ... that affects, limits, or avoids competition among them.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLC
a conspiracy to rig bids may be an agreement among competitors about ... who should be the successful bidder ... or who should refrain from bidding ... that affects, limits, or avoids competition among them.
discussed
Cited "see"
Catron v. Babbitt
See Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. F.T.C., 991 F.2d 859, 862 (D.C.Cir.1993) (citing Hennepin County v. Sullivan, 883 F.2d 85, 91 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1043 , 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ailsworth
United States v. Tranakos, 911 F.2d 1422, 1426 (10th Cir. 1990); see United States v. Mobile Materials, 871 F.2d 902, 911-912 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, Philpot v. United States, 493 U.S. 1043 , 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990); United States v. Theron, 782 F.2d 1510 (10th Cir.1986) (subsection (h)(7) treats exclusion of time because codefendants are in the case, not (h)(8)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paulino
See United States v. Staggs, 881 F.2d 1527 , 1533 n. 8 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 719 , 107 L.Ed.2d 739 (1990); See United States v. Mobile Materials Inc., 871 F.2d 902, 910 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1989); United States v. Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519 , 1526 n. 11 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. McClean, 528 F.2d 1250, 1257 (2d Cir.1976) 5 Although not expressly raised by defendant Leonardo Paulino on appeal, the government conceded the issue at oral argument 6 Fed.R.Evid. 1006 provides in pertinent part: [C]ontents of …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Helton
See United States v. Staggs, 881 F.2d 1527 , 1533 n. 8 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 719 , 107 L.Ed.2d 739 (1990); See United States v. Mobile Materials Inc., 871 F.2d 902, 910 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1989); United States v. Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519 , 1526 n. 11 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. McClean, 528 F.2d 1250, 1257 (2d Cir.1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noriega
See United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 871 F.2d 902, 917 (10th Cir.) (noting that courts have excluded extended periods of delay when all defendants are out on bond) (emphasis in original), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 866 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William Pilgrim
See United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 871 F.2d 902, 917 (10th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 881 F.2d 866 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990); United States v. Theron, 782 F.2d at 1516 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky E. Butler
(2×)
See United States v. Porter, 881 F.2d 878, 888 (10th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 348 , 107 L.Ed.2d 336 (1989) and United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 881 F.2d 866, 878 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied Philpot v. United States, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Bank of Canada v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See FDIC v. Texarkana Nat’l Bank, 874 F.2d 264, 268 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hca Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
See also Hennepin County v. Sullivan, 883 F.2d 85, 92-93 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1043 , 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (1990); accord Mt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jim R. Hunter v. State of New Mexico Attorney General of the State of New Mexico Robert J. Tansey, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary
A simple variance occurs "when 'the charging terms are unchanged, but the evidence at trial proves facts materially different from those alleged in the indictment.’ ” United States v. Hathaway, 798 F.2d 902, 910 (6th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1121 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986)); see also United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 881 F.2d 866, 872 (10th Cir.1989) (variance occurs when trial evidence establishes facts different than those charged), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 837 , 107 L.Ed.2d 833 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burrell
v.
City of Los Angeles
v.
City of Los Angeles
No. 89-651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1990.
Cited by 80 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Colorado (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.