Pinhas v. Summit Health, Ltd., 497 U.S. 1022 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Pinhas v. Summit Health, Ltd., 497 U.S. 1022 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Patricia Fruetel, A/K/A Joe, A/K/A the Expert (ca4, 1992-04-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Patricia Fruetel, A/K/A Joe, A/K/A the Expert
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
At the sentencing hearing, the district court may consider any information, including hearsay, which it finds reliable. * United States v. Bowman, 926 F.2d 380 (4th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Beaulieu, 893 F.2d 1177, 1180 (10th Cir.) (defendant "does not have an absolute right to confront witnesses whose information is made available to the [sentencing] court"), cert. denied, 58 U.S.L.W. 3834 (U.S. 1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Evrold Lee Dobson
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Beaulieu, 893 F.2d 1177, 1180 (10th Cir.) (defendant "does not have an absolute right to confront witnesses whose information is made available to the [sentencing] court"), cert. denied, 58 U.S.L.W. 3834 (U.S.1990); United States v. Kikumura, 918 F.2d 1084 , 1102-03 & n. 19 (3d Cir.1990) (court reluctant to impose confrontation clause jurisprudence on sentencing process), quoted in United States v. Johnson, 935 F.2d 47 (4th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pinhas
v.
Summit Health, Ltd.
No. 89-1889.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1990.
497 U.S. 1022
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of the parties to expedite consideration of the cross-petition for writ of certiorari or, in the alternative, to delay briefing in No. 89-1679, Summit Health, Ltd., et al. v. Pinhas [certiorari granted, 496 U. S. 935], denied.