Matta-Ballesteros v. Henman, 498 U.S. 878 (1990). · Go Syfert
Matta-Ballesteros v. Henman, 498 U.S. 878 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Cited for
holding that an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary because discovery placed all the facts essential to deciding the petitioner’s claim before the courtno pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • Wayne East v. Wayne Scott, 55 F.3d 996 (5th Cir. 1995).published 2 cites
    (holding that an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary because discovery placed all the facts essential to deciding the petitioner’s claim before the court)
  • East v. Scott, No. 94-10730 (5th Cir. Apr. 13, 1995).published
    (holding that an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary because discovery placed all the facts essential to deciding the petitioner's claim before the court)
Other citing cases12 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 2 more citing cases
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matta-Ballesteros
v.
Henman, Warden
No. 89-1797.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published opinion
498 U.S. 878

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.