green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: United States v. Pungitore ↗
Issue: vagueness challengeHI ↗
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…we believe that the appellants' primary contention is that the relationship plus continuity test for a pattern of racketeering under rico is unconstitutionally vague.... thus h.j. inc. is more pertinent than fort wayne books to our discussion.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.
a federal sentence does not begin to run until the defendant is delivered to the place where the sentence is to be served
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. v. Tatum
we believe that the appellants' primary contention is that the relationship plus continuity test for a pattern of racketeering under rico is unconstitutionally vague.... thus h.j. inc. is more pertinent than fort wayne books to our discussion.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. v. Tatum
we believe that the appellants' primary contention is that the relationship plus continuity test for a pattern of racketeering under rico is unconstitutionally vague.... thus h.j. inc. is more pertinent than fort wayne books to our discussion.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bloome
the double jeopardy analysis in ... grady ... cannot easily be transposed to the rico context____ instead, we consider the double jeopardy problem posed by the successive prosecutions in a rico case to be more closely analogous to that in garrett____
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bifield
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1120 (Sd Cir.1990)(government’s “Petite policy” does not confer substantive rights on defendants relating to double jeopardy and dual sovereigns doctrine), ce rt. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2010 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Stansfield, 874 F.Supp. 640, 647 (M.D.Pa.1994)(U.S. Attorney’s Manual did not create substantive rights relating to counsel’s conflict of interest, citing Pungi-tore ). 5 The basic question remains whether the base offense level for money laundering overstates the seriousness of the offense, an issu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pinez
See United States v. Cannistraro, 694 F.Supp. 62 , 72 n. 11 (D.N.J.1988) (“The courts impose the remedy of constructive trust where,-rightfully or wrongfully, a party had obtained property that unjustly enriches him.”) (citing 5 A. Scott, Scott on Trusts) § 462.2, at 347 (3d ed.1967)), aff'd in relevant part, 871 F.2d 1210 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 916 , 111 S.Ct. 2011 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991)..
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramos
See United States v. Adams, 759 F.2d 1099, 1108-09 (3d Cir.) (explaining that possession of weapons, even though they could “suggest a picture of violence to the jury,” “had probative value as evidence of the large scale of the [narcotics] conspiracy and the type of protection the conspirators felt they needed to protect their operation”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 971 , 106 S.Ct. 336 , 88 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); accord United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1152 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009, 2010 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Cisneros
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1105-07 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Secretary HUD
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1105-07 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
John F. Dawson v. Roger Scott, Warden
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1119 (3d Cir.1990) ("[A] federal sentence does not begin to run until the defendant is delivered to the place where the sentence is to be served.”), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 916, 111 S.Ct. 2009, 2010, 2011 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); Pinaud v. James, 851 F.2d 27, 30 (2d Cir.1988) (holding that a federal sentence commences when the Attorney General receives the convicted defendant into custody for service of that sentence). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Zirkle
See State v. Bennett, 798 S.W.2d 783 (Tenn.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); Tenn.R.App.P. 24.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sunday Obialo
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1128-29 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Homeland Stores, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, and Bob's Super Saver, Inc.
In interpreting a statutory provision, “context and structure are, as in examining any legal instrument, of substantial import in the interpretive exercise.” American Mining Congress v. EPA, 824 F.2d 1177 , 1185 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire, 477 U.S. 207 , 106 S.Ct. 2485 , 91 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 101 S.Ct. 1531, 1540-41 , 67 L.Ed.2d 694 (1981); Stafford v. Briggs, 444 U.S. 527, 535 , 100 S.Ct. 774, 780 , 63 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980)); see Aulston v. United States, 915 F.2d 584, 589 (10th Cir.1990) (“In …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Locascio, and John Gotti
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1148-49 (3d Cir.1990) (upholding testimony of agent who testified about structure of organized crime families), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956, 973-75 (1st Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 138 , 102 L.Ed.2d 110 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.
See generally, United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1125-26 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied sub. nom, Virgilio v. United States, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cannistraro
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cannistraro v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2011 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howe v. Ellenbecker
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota, 900 F.2d 1164 (8th Cir.1990), reh'g denied en banc, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9521 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Chippas
We believe it is clear, as the district court found, “that Grady pertains only to successive prosecutions, not to claims that multiple counts within a single indictment have double jeopardy connotations.” United States v. Oritz-Alarcon, 917 F.2d 651, 654 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2035 , 114 L.Ed.2d 120 (1991); accord United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 , 1117 n. 42 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eisenberg
See Cannistraro v. United States,-U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2011 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sage v. SICANGU OYATE HO. INC.
See generally Williams v. Lee, supra. Although Congress provided a mechanism by which states could assume civil jurisdiction over reservation Indians, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1322-1326 (1988), South Dakota has never effectively availed itself of this procedure. 2 Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota, 900 F.2d 1164, 1170-1171, 1174 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1105-06 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 757 (5th Cir.1978), aff'd in pertinent part in banc, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1105-06 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 757 (5th Cir.1978), aff'd in pertinent part in banc, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979). 86 For these reasons, I concur in the opinion of the Court. * Honorable Kenneth Conboy, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morton
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Pungitore, 910 F. 2d 1084 , 1127 (3rd Cir.1990) (holding that, when supported by the evidence, prosecutor's reference to defendant as a "cold-blooded killer" did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 98 (1991); Brennan v. State, 639 N.E. 2d 649, 652-53 (Ind. 1994) (same); Stouffer v. State, 738 P. 2d 1349, 1357 (Okla.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stansfield
See, e.g., United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1120 (3d Cir.1990) (internal rule of the Department of Justice known as the “Petite policy” does not create substantive rights for defendants), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bertoli
See, e.g., United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 , 1136 n. 1 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Scarfo v. United States, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); Riccobene, 709 F.2d at 228 n. 19; Palmeri, 630 F.2d at 202 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Utah v. Babbitt
See also Aulston v. United States, 915 F.2d 584, 589 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 2011, 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith
Pinaud v. James, 851 F.2d 27, 30 (2d Cir.1988) (citing repealed 18 U.S.C. § 3568 ); Salley v. United States, 786 F.2d 546, 548 (2d Cir.1986); see also United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1118-19 (3d Cir.1990) (“a federal sentence does not begin to run until the defendant is delivered to the place where the sentence is to be served”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 -11, 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Crosby
United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496 , 497 n. 1 (7th Cir.1991); see also, United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1103-05 (3d Cir.1990) (holding that RICO is not void for vagueness, notwithstanding Justice Scalia’s remarks in H.J., Inc.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2010 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Tripp, 782 F.2d 38, 42 (6th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1128 , 106 S.Ct. 1656 , 90 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Danny Leon Standefer, United States of America v. Anthony Eugene Glasco, United States of America v. Michael Gene Edwards, United States of America v. Ralph Eugene Ivy Kenneth Ray Kirk
Compare United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1536-39 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991), and United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); with United States v. Felix, 926 F.2d 1522 (10th Cir.1991), pet'n for cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 47 , 116 L.Ed.2d 25 (1991), and United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (2d Cir.1990), pet'n for cert. filed, No. 90-1527. 13 We decline to address these issues because they were not raised in the district court and…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Standefer
Compare United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1536-39 (11th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991), and United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); with United States v. Felix, 926 F.2d 1522 (10th Cir.1991), pet’n for cert, granted, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 47 , 116 L.Ed.2d 25 (1991), and United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (2d Cir.1990), pet’n for cert, filed, No. 90-1527.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raphello Harris, Sr.
United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 766 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978); see also United States v. Pungitore, 910 *420 F.2d 1084, 1149-50 (3d Cir.1990) (admitting a taped conversation to show the relationships among co-conspirators), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. O’Leary, 739 F.2d 135, 136 (3d Cir.1984) (admitting other-acts evidence to provide background information and parties’ acquaintanceship), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 776 (1985); United States v. Simmons, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
South Dakota
v.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe
v.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe
No. 90-749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1991.
500 U.S. 915
1991 U.S. LEXIS 2768
Cited by 163 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.