green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Clarke
(2×)
But see Bradley v. Meachum, 918 F.2d 338 (2d Cir.1990) (no invocation of right to remain silent when suspect stated he did not want to discuss his involvement in the crime but immediately denied any connection to the robbery and proffered an explanation of his whereabouts), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1221 , 111 S.Ct. 2835 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1991); United States v. Thompson, 866 F.2d 268, 271 (8th Cir.) (no invocation of right to remain silent where suspect said “I’ll wait a little while before I’m interviewed”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 828 , 110 S.Ct. 94 , 107 L.Ed.2d 59 (1989); United Sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. James P. Kucinski(076798)
(2×)
Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 478, 86 S.Ct. at 1630, 16 L.Ed.2d at 726 (“Any statement given freely and voluntarily without any compelling influences is, of course, admissible in evidence.”); see also Bradley v. Meachum, 918 F.2d 338, 343 (2d Cir. 1990) (“[The defendant] cannot be said to have invoked his fifth amendment right regarding his willingness to discuss his involvement in the crime because, in the same breath, he denied any involvement.”), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1221 , 111 S.Ct. 2835 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1991); United States v. Lorenzo, 570 F.2d 294, 298 (9th Cir. 1978) (“[I]n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Donovan
See also Bradley v. Meachum, 918 F.2d 338, 343 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1221 (1991) (not improper to comment on omission in post-Miranda statement where defendant did not testify at trial). d.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buelow
v.
Baker, Warden
v.
Baker, Warden
No. 90-7839.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.