green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.2 score
“thomas i”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mirna Rivera
But see United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 , 529- 30 (7th Cir.) (forbidding departures based on family -14- 14 responsibilities, except where probation or fines are at issue), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 171 (1991). 4.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mirna Rivera
But see United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 , 529- _______ _____________ ______ 30 (7th Cir.) (forbidding departures based on family -14- 14 responsibilities, except where probation or fines are at issue), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 171 (1991). ____________ 4.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert Adamo
But see United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 529-30 (7th Cm.) (forbidding departures based on family responsibilities, except where probation or fines are at issue), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991). 4.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Scott E. Elliott
But cf. United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 528 (7th Cir.) (“there is little substantive difference between a sentence of probation and a very short period of confinement”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Cynthia Johnson
But see United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 530 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
JJK INDUSTRIES v. KPlus Inc.
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Exxon Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum
Anderson, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Milson v. St Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Anderson, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Thirsty's, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.
Anderson, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Richards v. Seariver Maritime Financial Holdings, Inc.
Anderson, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ginzburg v. Memorial Healthcare Systems, Inc.
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Casiano, A/K/A Jose Rivera Jose Casiano, United States of America v. Alfredo Dejesus
Accord United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 529 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Davidson v. Service Corp. International
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2510-11 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Rayha v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-51 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Washington v. HCA Health Services of Texas Inc.
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Browning-Ferris Industries Inc. Securities Litigation
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 *878 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
International Marine Carriers v. Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1088 , 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayes v. Galley
R.Crim.P. 82(d) is prejudicial); see United States v. Moore, 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir.) (“[ujnder Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d), a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Seagull Energy Corp.
See Lewis [v. Glendel Drilling Co.], 898 F.2d [1083] at 1084 [(5th Cir.1990)] ("[B]ecause of an apparently contradictory line of cases in our circuit and the uncertain policy underpinning our result, the appellant would justly ask 'why' ”?) [, cert, denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991)].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Audley E. McKelvey Jr.
See United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 529-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 171 (1991); United States v. Shortt, 919 F.2d 1325, 1328 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Deigert, 916 F.2d 916, 918-19 (4th Cir.1990). 59 We have suggested that a sentencing court may depart downward from the sentencing guidelines upon a specific showing of extremely unusual and burdensome family circumstances.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Adam's Mark Hotel
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Fire Insurance v. Rominger
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick E. Eiselt
See United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
J. Gerber & Co., Inc. v. M/V INAGUA TANIA
Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hollier v. Union Texas Petroleum Corp.
See Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1087 (5th Cir.1990) (commenting that en banc review would be necessary to treat special purpose vessels as artificial islands), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991). 10 Union Texas relies upon Offshore Logistics v. Tallentire, 477 U.S. 207, 217-19 , 106 S.Ct. 2485, 2491-92 , 91 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986), for the proposition that OCSLA does not apply to platform workers injured on the high seas. 2 Hollier was not killed on the high seas, however.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hollier v. Union Texas Petroleum Corp.
See Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1087 (5th Cir.1990) (commenting that en banc review would be necessary to treat special purpose vessels as artificial is *665 lands), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calle
See United States v. Moore, 931 F.2d 245, 249 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991) (Rule 11(e)(2) “is properly read to mean that ‘all material terms’ (or material ‘details’ or ‘elements’) of the agreement must be disclosed.”); United States v. Guevara, 949 F.2d 706, 707 (4th Cir.1991) (Wilkins, J., dissenting) (“When the government and a defendant enter into a plea agreement as a complete statement of their obligations, it may not be supplemented with unmentioned terms at a later date.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darlene Faye Mogel
See United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 529-30 (7th Cir.) (highlighting the inter- and intra-circuit disagreements about a district court’s authority to depart on the basis of family ties and responsibilities), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Welsh v. Boy Scouts of America
See generally United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 529 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991), and Alschuler v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 686 F.2d 472, 488 (7th Cir.1982), employing similar ejusdem generis rationale.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
El Aguila Food Products, Inc. v. Gruma Corp.
Id. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see also Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1084 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Joseph McCarthy United States of America v. Clarence William Houston, Also Known as C.W. Houston, United States of America v. John Walter Piner, United States of America v. Carl Luverne Thompsen, United States of America v. Michael Arney Ness, United States of America v. Stephen Lloyd Labrie
(See Change of Plea Tr. at 30; see also Sentencing Tr. at 34-35 ("based upon your plea of guilty it is considered and adjudged that you are guilty of each of these offenses.").) Accordingly, Thompsen's bald-faced assertion that he was never adjudged guilty (Appellant's Br. at 32) is absolutely wrong 5 Thompsen asserts United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991), claiming it compels the conclusion that this court has jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court's downward departure.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Akindele
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 530-31 (7th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Canoy, 38 F.3d 893, 906 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Akindele
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 530-31 (7th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Canoy, 38 F.3d 893, 906 (7th Cir.1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCray v. DPC Industries, Inc.
Id. at 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. at 2510-11; see also Lewis v. Glendel Drilling Co., 898 F.2d 1083, 1088 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 857 , 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles E. Emery
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 531 (7th Cir.) ("The sentencing judge is ... required to articulate the specific factors justifying the extent of his departure and *914 to adjust the defendant's sentence by utilizing an incremental process that quantifies the impact of the factors considered by the court on defendant's sentence."), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 171 , 116 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991); United States v. Lira-Barraza, 941 F.2d 745, 748-50 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc) (similar).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Emery
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526, 531 (7th Cir.) ("The sentencing judge is . . . required to articulate the specific factors justifying the extent of his departure and to adjust the defendant's sentence by utilizing an incremental process that quantifies the impact of the factors considered by the court on defendant's sentence."), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 171 (1991); United States v. Lira-Barraza, 941 F.2d 745, 748-50 (9th Cir. 1991) (en banc) (similar).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Emery
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 , ___ ____ ______________ ______ 531 (7th Cir.) ("The sentencing judge is . . . required to articulate the specific factors justifying the extent of his departure and to adjust the defendant's sentence by utilizing an incremental process that quantifies the impact of the factors considered by the court on defendant's sentence."), cert. denied, _____ ______ 112 S. Ct. 171 (1991); United States v. Lira-Barraza, 941 F.2d _____________ ____________ 745, 748-50 (9th Cir. 1991) (en banc) (similar).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Avanti Services, Inc.
v.
Glendel Drilling Co.
v.
Glendel Drilling Co.
No. 91-26.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (5)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.