Harris v. Dep't of Agric., 506 U.S. 825 (1992).

Harris v. Dep't of Agric., 506 U.S. 825 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) published 0.3 score

5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.

How cited ↗

Cited for

Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion

“The controlling date for purposes of the running of the respective statutes of limitations is when a purchaser of securities knew — or in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known — of the alleged wrongdoing.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits Trust v. Dynegy, Inc., 339 F. Supp. 2d 804 (S.D. Tex. 2004).published
“The controlling date for purposes of the running of the respective statutes of limitations is when a purchaser of securities knew — or in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known — of the alleged wrongdo…”
In re Dynegy, Inc. Sec. Litig., 339 F. Supp. 2d 804 (S.D. Tex. 2004).published
“The controlling date for purposes of the running of the respective statutes of limitations is when a purchaser of securities knew or in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the alleged wrongdo…”