green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon
See United States v. Green, 40 F.3d 1167, 1174 (11th Cir.1994) (finding prior arrest for possession of distributable amount of cocaine relevant to establish intent for charge of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1089 , 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 733 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. Green, 40 F.3d 1167, 1174 (11th Cir.1994) (finding prior arrest for possession of distributable amount of cocaine relevant to establish intent for charge of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1089 , 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 733 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. 19 Green, 40 F.3d 1167, 1174 (11th Cir. 1994) (finding prior arrest for possession of distributable amount of cocaine relevant to establish intent for charge of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1089 , 115 S. Ct. 1809 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melvin Joe Montgomery
(2×)
See id. (evidence that a blouse fit a prisoner admissible despite compulsion exerted upon him to try it on); see also United States v. Bullard, 37 F.3d 765, 768-69 (1st Cir.1994) (because there is no Fifth Amendment right to refuse to “don a hat,” it is permissible to draw inference of guilt from refusal to cooperate), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 734 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melvin J. Montgomery
See id. (evidence that a blouse fit a prisoner admissible despite compulsion exerted upon him to try it on); see also United States v. Bullard, 37 F.3d 765, 768-69 (1st Cir. 1994) (because there is no Fifth Amendment right to refuse to "don a hat," it is permissible to draw inference of guilt from refusal to cooperate), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1809 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frazier
See, e.g., United States v. Green, 40 F.3d 1167, 1175 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 733 and — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2262 , 132 L.Ed.2d 268 (1995); United States v. Robinson, 935 F.2d 201, 205 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1037 , 112 S.Ct. 885 , 116 L.Ed.2d 789 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Frazier, United States of America v. Darence Eugene Hutchinson, Kenya Brown, Albert Lintez Brown, A/K/A \Pee Pee\" A/K/A \"James\"
See, e.g., United States v. Green, 40 F.3d 1167, 1175 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 733 and --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2262 , 132 L.Ed.2d 268 (1995); United States v. Robinson, 935 F.2d 201, 205 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1037 , 112 S.Ct. 885 , 116 L.Ed.2d 789 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250, 1259 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 (1986); see also United States v. Baskin-Bey, 45 -14- 14 F.3d 200, 203 (7th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1809 (1995).**** Under that court's approach, a pretrial motion that does not receive a hearing is deemed to be "under advisement" on the date the government's response is due, even if the response has not actually been filed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. ___ _____________ Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250, 1259 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 ______ _____________ U.S. 853 (1986); see also United States v. Baskin-Bey, 45 _________ ______________ __________ -14- 14 F.3d 200, 203 (7th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1809 ____________ (1995).**** Under that court's approach, a pretrial motion that does not receive a hearing is deemed to be "under advisement" on the date the government's response is due, even if the response has not actually been filed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
See United States v. Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250, 1259 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 187 , 93 L.Ed.2d 121 (1986); see also United States v. Baskin-Bey, 45 F.3d 200, 203 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1809 , 131 L.Ed.2d 734 (1995). 4 Under that court’s approach, a pretrial motion that does not receive a hearing is deemed to be “under advisement” on the date the government’s response is due, even if the response has not actually been filed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Courts
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-8585.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1995.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.