green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Cited for
While the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.
- Place, No. 6:22-cv-06356 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2025).(While the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…)
- Adams v. Whitehair, No. 6:21-cv-06298 (W.D.N.Y. July 18, 2025).(While the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…)
- Shariff v. Goord, No. 6:05-cv-06504 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2025).(While the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“while the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.”
- Place, No. 6:22-cv-06356 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2025).“while the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.”
- Adams v. Whitehair, No. 6:21-cv-06298 (W.D.N.Y. July 18, 2025).“while the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.”
- Shariff v. Goord, No. 6:05-cv-06504 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2025).“while the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact is a precondition for summary judgment, the crux of a summary judgment analysis is whether the movant has established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.”
Other citing cases
- Newport v. Ford Motor Co., 91 F.3d 1164 (8th Cir. 1996).published
- James F. Newport v. Ford Motor Co., 91 F.3d 1164 (8th Cir. 1996).published
- Smith v. Sch. Bd. of Polk Cnty., Florida, 205 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2002).published
- Sanguinetti v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 114 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (S.D. Fla. 2000).published
- Brandsasse v. City of Suffolk, Va., 72 F. Supp. 2d 608 (E.D. Va. 1999).published
- Barreto v. ITT World Directories, Inc., 62 F. Supp. 2d 387 (D.P.R. 1999).published
- Thistle v. May Dep't Stores, No. CV-97-423-SD (D.N.H. Dec. 30, 1998).published
- Satterfield v. Borough of Schuylkill Haven, 12 F. Supp. 2d 423 (E.D. Pa. 1998).published
- United States v. Robert Johnston, 146 F.3d 785 (10th Cir. 1998).published
- Key v. Hearst Corp., 963 F. Supp. 283 (S.D.N.Y. 1997).published
Show 5 more citing cases
- Levy v. Kosher Overseers Ass'n of Am., Inc., 104 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1997).published
- Levy v. Kosher Overseers Ass'n of Am., Inc., 104 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1997).published
- Rogers v. City of San Antonio, Texas, 211 F. Supp. 2d 829 (W.D. Tex. 2002).published
- Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Prot. Life Ins. Co., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, 108 F.3d 1531 (2d Cir. 1997).published
- Stanley Diaz-Gandia v. Maria Rosa Dapena-Thompson, 90 F.3d 609 (1st Cir. 1996).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Village of Depew
v.
Gummo
v.
Gummo
No. 95-1465.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1996.
Published opinion
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Oklahoma (1)
C.' A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.