green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Cited for
[T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States. The relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury
- 42 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861 in Re: H. Edwin & Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. United States of Am. v. H. Edwin Schimmels Mary Jo Schimmels, 127 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1997).published ([T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States. The relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechan…)
- United States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels), 127 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1997).published ([T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States. The relator’s right to recovery exists solely as a mechan…)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the false claims act exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury”
- 42 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861 in Re: H. Edwin & Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. United States of Am. v. H. Edwin Schimmels Mary Jo Schimmels, 127 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1997).published “the private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the false claims act exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism f…”
- United States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels), 127 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1997).published “the private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the false claims act exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism f…”
Other citing cases
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Grp., Inc., 171 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (M.D. Fla. 2001).published
- United States v. Cnty. of Delaware, 123 F.3d 734 (3d Cir. 1997).published
- Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc. v. J.E.M. AG Supply, Inc., 33 F. Supp. 2d 794 (N.D. Iowa 1999).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Northrop Grumman Corp.
v.
United States ex rel. Green
v.
United States ex rel. Green
No. 95-1730.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
Published opinion
518 U.S. 1018
1996 U.S. LEXIS 4079
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.