green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rehm v. Ford Motor Co.
See United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 392-93 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1219 , 117 S.Ct. 1712 , 137 L.Ed.2d 836 (1997), 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1858 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997) (explaining that double hearsay is admissible only when each layer is excused by a hearsay exception) (citing United States v. Baker, 693 F.2d 183, 188 (D.C.Cir.1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc.
See United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 392-93 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S.1219, 117 S.Ct. 1712 , 137 L.Ed.2d 836 (1997), 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1858 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997) (explaining that double hearsay is admissible only when each layer is excused by a hearsay exception) (citing United States v. Baker, 693 F.2d 183, 188 (D.C.Cir.1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley
See United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 387 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, Lawanson v. United States, 520 U.S. 1247 (1997), and cert. denied, Debowale v. United States, 520 U.S. 1219 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Byrd
See, e.g., Devonshire v. United States, 691 A. 2d 165, 168-69 (D.C.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1859 , 137 L.Ed. 2d 1060 (1997); State v. Hallum, 606 N.W. 2d 351, 354-56 (Iowa 2000); Commonwealth v. Edwards, 444 Mass. 526 , 830 N.E. 2d 158, 165-68 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Molina, 106 F.3d 1118, 1123-24 (2d Cir.) (reversing district court’s failure to take into account the wounding of a bystander by a guard, a reasonably foreseeable outcome of defendant’s coconspirators’ “attempt to rob an armored car protected by armed guards on a busy street during the middle of the day”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1859 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997); see also id. at 1122 (“Even if Molina hoped that the original plan would be carried out and that no shooting would occur, it was nonetheless reasonable for him to foresee that, in …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. United States
D.C. 45, 48, 70 F.3d 146, 149 (1995) (defense may not present evidence “supporting a version of events” that is plainly false, “and at the same time [seek] to disable the government from revealing the truth to the jury”); see also Devonshire v. United States, 691 A.2d 165, 169 (D.C.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1859 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997) (defense may not object, on either Confrontation Clause or hearsay grounds, to the admission of out-of-court statements by an absent witness when defendant “was responsible for the witness’s unavailability”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael J. Sickinger
See, e.g., United States v. Molina, 106 F.3d 1118 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1859 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997); United States v. Muhammad, 948 F.2d 1449 (6th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 98-3851
See, e.g., United States v. Molina, 106 F .3d 1118 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 (1997); United States v. Muhammad, 948 F.3d 1449 (6th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gelis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-8776.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.