Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Katz v. United States
But see, Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 800-01 (5th Cir. 1998) ("There is no inherent conflict between a finding of excessive force and a finding of qualified immunity."), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 863 (including "[w]hether a jury finding that a constitutional violation incurred by use of excessive force in an arrest necessarily precludes a finding of qualified immunity, so as to make such dual findings irreconcilable"), cert. dismissed, 119 S. Ct. 1493 (1999) (pursuant to agreement between the parties). 24 As the district court recognized, in an excessive force case, a material issue off…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Katz v. United States
But see, Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 800-01 (5th Cir.1998) (“There is no inherent conflict between a finding of excessive force and a finding of qualified immunity.”), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 863 , 142 L.Ed.2d 716 (including “[w]hether a jury finding that a constitutional violation incurred by use of excessive force in an arrest necessarily precludes a finding of qualified immunity, so as to make such dual findings irreconcilable”), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999) (pursuant to agreement between the parties).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lekwa v. City of Houston
Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 ; Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 795 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. granted in part, 119 S.Ct. 863 (1999), and cert. dismissed, 119 S.Ct. 1493 14 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGIST. SYS., INC.
See FDIC v. Lacentra Trucking, Inc. , 157 F.3d 1292 , 1302 (11th Cir.1998), cert. dismissed , [526] U.S. [1083], 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milam v. City of San Antonio
See Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 797-98 (5th Cir.1998), cert. granted, 525 U.S. 1098 , 119 S.Ct. 863 , 142 L.Ed.2d 716 , and cert. dismissed, 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Patricia Littrell, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Daniel Jake Franklin, in His Official and Individual Capacities, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Jamal Stephenson v. John Doe
See 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Bryan County, OK
See, Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 863 , cert. dismissed, 119 S. Ct. 1493 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sikes v. Gaytan
(2×)
See Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 800 (5th Cir.1998), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 149 F.8d 1181 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Bryan County
See, Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791 (5th Cir.1998), cert. granted, 525 U.S. 1098 , 119 S.Ct. 863 , 142 L.Ed.2d 716 , cert. dismissed, 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Jill Brown v. Bryan County, Ok
See, Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 863 , cert. dismissed, 119 S. Ct. 1493 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Murray
See Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 797 (5th Cir.1998), cert. dismissed, 526 U.S. 1083 , 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
ASX Investment Corp. v. Newton
See FDIC v. Lacentra Trucking, Inc., 157 F.3d 1292, 1302 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. dismissed, __ U.S. __, 119 S. Ct. 1493 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
ASX Investment Corp. v. Newton
See FDIC v. Lacentra Trucking, Inc., 157 F.3d 1292, 1302 (11th Cir.1998), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1493 , 143 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. Wilburn
Accordingly, “[t]he court must search for a reasonable way to read the verdicts as expressing a coherent view of the case, ... and if there is any way to view a case that makes the jury’s answers to the special verdict form consistent with one another, the court must resolve the answers that way even if the interpretation is strained.” McGuire, 1 F.3d at 1311 ; see also Snyder v. Trepagnier, 142 F.3d 791, 800 (5th Cir.1998) (“Only if there is no view of the case that will make the jury’s answers consistent may we set aside its decision.”) (citation omitted), cert. dismissed, 526 U.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrie
v.
Snyder, Warden
v.
Snyder, Warden
No. 98-8856 (A-832).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Souter, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.