United States v. Salazar, No. 95-50617 (5th Cir. Apr. 23, 1996). · Go Syfert
United States v. Salazar, No. 95-50617 (5th Cir. Apr. 23, 1996). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Salazar
95-50617.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 23, 1996.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50617
Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL SALAZAR, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-94-CR-102-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
March 28, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Salazar, Jr., appeals his conditional plea of guilty to the offense of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The condition of Salazar's plea rested on his belief that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized after an investigatory stop by a U.S. Border Patrol Agent. He argues that the agent lacked the required "particularized suspicion" to justify the stop of the vehicle.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-50617 We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. See United States v. Cardona, 955 F.2d 976, 977 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 (1992).

AFFIRMED.