Acremant v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 864 (2005).

Acremant v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 864 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: section 12 rightsOR ↗ Issue: prima facie showing errorOR ↗ Issue: Smith testOR ↗ Issue: ex post facto clauseOR ↗ Quoted verbatim 1× 10.4 score

39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: State v. Brown, 367 P.3d 544 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)

Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2006 2016 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases11 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

State v. Brown, 367 P.3d 544 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).published
State v. Bush, 421 P.3d 403 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).published 2 cites
State v. McAnulty, 338 P.3d 653 (Or. 2014).published
State v. Martinez, 328 P.3d 1277 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).published
State v. Doyle, 324 P.3d 598 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).published
Stewart ex rel. Hill v. Kralman, 248 P.3d 6 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).published 3 cites
State v. Nichols, 390 P.3d 1001 (Or. 2017).published
State v. Swan, 366 P.3d 802 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).published
Hayward v. Belleque, 273 P.3d 926 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).published
State v. Hunt, 200 P.3d 165 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).published

Show 1 more citing case

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 23

Cited "see" 8

Cited "see, e.g." 5

Compared "cf." 2

Cited as authority (quoted) 1

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Acremant
v.
Oregon

No. 04-10660.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 3, 2005.

Published opinion

546 U.S. 864

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

Sup. Ct. Ore. Certio-rari denied.

Your account