Roberts v. Titus Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 546 U.S. 1004 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Roberts v. Titus Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 546 U.S. 1004 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Commitment of Feldmann (wisctapp, 2007-02-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re Commitment of Feldmann
Wis. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bush, 2005 WI 103, ¶ 23 , 283 Wis. 2d 90 , 699 N.W.2d 80 , cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 631 (2005). ¶ 13.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Commitment of Nelson
Wis. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bush, 2005 WI 103, ¶ 19 , 283 Wis. 2d 90 , 699 N.W.2d 80 ("[B]ecause Bush has facially challenged the constitutionality of chapter 980, his challenge goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court [and] .. . cannot be waived .. .."), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 631 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Marcum
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 685 (8th Cir.) ("The law is well settled that extending a limitations period before prosecution is barred does not violate the ex post facto clause.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 631 , 163 L.Ed.2d 512 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leo Sure Chief, Jr.
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 685 (8th Cir.) (holding, in a case *925 involving the extension of the statute of limitations for sexual abuse offenses from five years to the child’s 25th birthday, that the new statute could apply retroactively as long as the case was not time-barred when the new statute was enacted, even though Congress failed to provide an explicit savings clause), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 126 S.Ct. 631 , 163 L.Ed.2d 512 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Chief
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 685 (8th Cir.) (hold- ing, in a case involving the extension of the statute of limita- tions for sexual abuse offenses from five years to the child’s 25th birthday, that the new statute could apply retroactively as long as the case was not time-barred when the new statute was enacted, even though Congress failed to provide an explicit savings clause), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 631 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roberts
v.
Titus County Memorial Hospital
No. 05-427.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 2005.
546 U.S. 1004
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Ci A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.