No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nichols, Shepard and Company
v.
Marsh
v.
Marsh
95.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1889.
Published opinion
Mr. Charles F. Burton for the motion., Mr. R. A. Parker opposing.
Per Curiam.
Published
Per curiam:
On consideration of the motion for a retaxation of costs in this cause, and of the argument of counsel thereupon, had as well in support of as against the same:
It is now here ordered by the court that the amount advanced by the appellants in this cause towards printing the record be recoverable by them from the appellees herein.
[This order is entitled only in ,the cross-suit of Nichols v. Marsh.]