Union Tubing Co. v. Patterson Co., 131 U.S. 448 (1888). · Go Syfert
Search
Union Tubing Co. v. Patterson Co., 131 U.S. 448 (1888). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Exxon Co. v. Bernardsville Bd. of Adj., 481 A.2d 1172 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
How cited ↗
Cited for
33 L. Ed. at 216 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Exxon Co. v. Bernardsville Bd. of Adj., 481 A.2d 1172 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984).published
    Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955). [ 408 U.S. at 95 , 92 S.Ct. at 2289 , 33 L.Ed. at 216] Bernardsville has seen fit to subject certain uses, of which public garages ar…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Tubing Co.
v.
Patterson Co., Limited
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1888.
Published opinion
131 U.S. 448
1888 U.S. LEXIS 2498
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

131 U.S. 448

9 S.Ct. 804

33 L.Ed. 216

UNION TUBING CO.
v.
PATTERSON CO., Limited.

December 7, 1888.

[*~448–450]1

Edmund Wetmore, for appellant.

2

Benjamin F. Thurston, for appellee.

3

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.