discussed Cited "see" HORMACHEA v. State See Stephens v. State, 787 So.2d 747 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1025 , 122 S.Ct. 556 , 151 L.Ed.2d 431 (2001); State v. Carrizales, 356 So.2d 274 (Fla.1978); Billie v. State, 963 So.2d 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), review denied, No. SC07-1973, 978 So.2d 159 , 2008 WL 509239 (Fla. Feb. 26, 2008); see also Roberts v. State, 425 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), pet. for review denied, 434 So.2d 888 (Fla.1983).

discussed Cited "see" Santiago v. State See Stephens v. State, 787 So.2d 747, 754 (Fla.) ("A trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard."), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1025 , 122 S.Ct. 556 , 151 L.Ed.2d 431 (2001).

discussed Cited "see" Gensler v. State See Stephens v. State, 787 So.2d 747 (Fla.)(relevant evidence has logical tendency to prove or disprove a fact of consequence to the outcome of the case), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1025 , 122 S.Ct. 556 , 151 L.Ed.2d 431 (2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Conner v. State However, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of guilt established at trial."), approved on other grounds, 572 So.2d 1387 (Fla.1991); see also Stephens v. State, 787 So.2d 747, 759 (Fla.) ("Weighing all the evidence in this case and considering the overwhelming evidence of guilt, we find the trial judge acted within his discretion, and any potential error was harmless.") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1025 , 122 S.Ct. 556 , 151 L.Ed.2d 431 (2001).