Abbott v. United States, 534 U.S. 1040 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Abbott v. United States, 534 U.S. 1040 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The law of the case doctrine requires a district court to follow the appellate court’s resolution of an issue of law in all subsequent proceedings in the same case, [citation].”
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bennett v. Mueller (cacd, 2005-04-01)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bennett v. Mueller
C.D. Cal. · 2005 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the law of the case doctrine requires a district court to follow the appellate court's resolution of an issue of law in all subsequent proceedings in the same case, .
cited Cited "see" Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc 4769 (or.tax 7-19-2010)
Or. T.C. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pennzoil , 332 Or at 547 (citing with approval Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. , 25 Cal 4th 508 , 22 P3d 324 , cert den , 534 US 1040 , 122 S Ct 614 , 151 L Ed 537 (2001)).
discussed Cited "see" Wiley v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brice v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 240 F.3d 1367, 1371 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1040 , 122 S.Ct. 614 , 151 L.Ed.2d 538 (2001); Weddel v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 100 F.3d at 932 .
cited Cited "see" O'Connell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Fed. Cl. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brice v. Thompson, 534 U.S. 1040 , 122 S.Ct. 614 , 151 L.Ed.2d 538 (Nov. 26, 2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abbott, aka Roberson
v.
United States
No. 01-134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 2001.
534 U.S. 1040
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.