green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Holestine v. California Department of Corrections
See Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118, 1129 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 667 , 151 L.Ed.2d 581 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yount v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
(2×)
See, e.g., Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 224-25 (3d Cir.2000) (“[G]overnment actions, which standing alone do not violate the Constitution, may nonetheless be constitutional torts if motivated in substantial part by a desire to punish an individual for [the] exercise of a constitutional right.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1066 , 122 S.Ct. 667 , 151 L.Ed.2d 581 (2001); Frazier v. Dubois, 922 F.2d 560 (10th Cir.1990); Bridges v. Russell, 757 F.2d 1155 (11th Cir.1985); Murphy v. Missouri Dep’t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Medical Supply Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118, 1134 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., Beauclair v. Puente Gomez, 534 U.S. 1066 , 122 S.Ct. 667 , 151 L.Ed.2d 581 (2001) (recklessness combined with other conduct meets the bad faith requirement); Fink v. Gomez, 239 F.3d 989, 993-94 (9th Cir.2001) (same); Marrocco v. Gen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. Adams
See, e.g., Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118, 1127 (9th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom Beauclair v. Gomez, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 667 , 151 L.Ed.2d 581 (2001) (holding that a prison official’s failure to take remedial action after violations were committed by his subordinates is actionable under section 1983 as a policy or practice claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
East Cascade Women's Group, P.C. v. Tutthill
Compare Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.), cert denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 667 , 151 L.Ed.2d 581 (2001) (affirming sanctions award where attorneys willfully and repeatedly examined prisoners’ attorney-client privileged materials), and Pacific Harbor Capital, Inc. v. Carnival Air Lines, Inc., 210 F.3d 1112, 1115-18 (9th Cir.2000) (affirming sanctions award where attorney advised client to violate TRO), with Barber v. Miller, 146 F.3d 707, 711 (9th Cir.1998) (stating that “ignorance or negligence” does not support § 1927 sanctions), Zambrano v. City of Tustin, 885 F.2d 1473, 148…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beauclair, Director, Idaho Department of Correction
v.
Puente Gomez
v.
Puente Gomez
No. 01-606.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 2001.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.