green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Package Service Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. DMR Corp., 699 F.2d 788, 791-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983). 9 In deciding whether a parent corporation is liable for its subsidiary's unfair labor practices, the Board cannot ignore the general principle that "[t]he insulation of a stockholder from the debts and obligations of his corporation is the norm, not the exception." NLRB v. Deena Artware, Inc., 361 U.S. 398, 403 , 80 S.Ct. 441, 443 , 4 L.Ed.2d 400 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Package Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. DMR Corp., 699 F.2d 788, 791-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis Robinson v. John H. Dalton, Secretary to United States Department of the Navy
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 755 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brem v. Drs. Decarlo, Lyon, Hearn & Pazourek, P.A.
See Kappas v. Chestnut Lodge, Inc., 709 F.2d 878, 880 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (applying the privilege to staff conferences established as a means of evaluating the patient care and treatment programs at a hospital). 5 Thus, I reject the defendants’ argument that the error management conferences conducted by Dr. "Wheeler do not fall within the purview of the medical review committee statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brennan v. National Telephone Directory Corp.
Brennan I, 850 F.Supp. at 340 ; see Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3d Cir.) (equitable tolling appropriate if (1) the defendant has actively mislead the plaintiff, (2) the plaintiff has been prevented from asserting his rights, or (3) if plaintiff has timely asserted his rights in the wrong forum), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Zeneca Inc.
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (explaining appropriate instances of equitable tolling of statute of limitations); Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 569 F.2d 187, 193 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978) (finding equitable tolling appropriate under the ADEA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gabrielle v. Barrett, Haentjens & Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seredinski, Louise v. Clifton Precision Products Co., a Division of Litton Systems, Inc
(2×)
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 , 752-53 and ns. 4 & 8 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (suggesting that the EEOC’s failure to comply with its own regulations requiring deferral to state agency would constitute grounds for equitable tolling in Title VII action); see also McKee v. McDonnell Douglas Technical Services Co., 700 F.2d 260, 264 (5th Cir.1983) (Title VII claimant should not be penalized for EEOC’s failure to follow its own regulations); Hicks v. ABT Associates, Inc., 572 F.2d 960, 964 (3d Cir.1978) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slenkamp v. Borough of Brentwood
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 751 (3d Cir.1983) (citing School Dist. of Allentown v. Marshall, 657 F.2d 16, 20 (ed Cir.1981)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Board of Regents of State of Kan.
Baker Chemical Corp., 598 F.2d 829 (3d Cir.1979) (no tolling where defendant did nothing to cause untimeliness) with Meyer v. Riegel Products Corp., 720 F.2d 303 (3d Cir.1983), cert. dismissed, 465 U.S. 1091 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 79 L.Ed.2d 910 (1984) (tolling possible where plaintiff alleged that defendant deceived him into *1440 postponing the filing of a claim); see also, Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson v. City of Wichita, Kan.
See also Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 150 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kocian
v.
Getty Refining & Marketing Co.
v.
Getty Refining & Marketing Co.
No. 83-197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.