No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maria Victoria Castro
v.
Luz Marina Castro
v.
Luz Marina Castro
21-2236.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 30, 2022.
Published opinion
✓
352 So. 3d 437 gap-fill: Leagle volume listing
Published
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed November 30, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Nos. 3D21-2235 & 3D21-2236
Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-1719, 19-2235
Maria Victoria Castro,
Appellant,
vs.
Luz Marina Castro,
Appellee.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant.
Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.
Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
[*~437–438]State of Florida
Opinion filed November 30, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Nos. 3D21-2235 & 3D21-2236
Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-1719, 19-2235
Maria Victoria Castro,
Appellant,
vs.
Luz Marina Castro,
Appellee.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant.
Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.
Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (“When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”) see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986) (“[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact.”).