Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co., 142 F. 287 (1906). · Go Syfert
Scott v. Stockholders' Oil Co., 142 F. 287 (1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SCOTT
v.
STOCKHOLDERS' OIL CO.
No. 1.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania.
Jan 2, 1906.
Published opinion
142 F. 287
1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4590
Samuel J. Houston and Lawrence W. Baxter, for complainant., Wm. J. Wagenknight, for defendants and Theodore J. Dumble., Stern & Wolf, for Howard George.
McPherson.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

I agree with the master that Theodore J. Dumble did not offer a satisfactory excuse for his failure to produce the books and other papers referred to in the former order of the court. Howard George did, I think, explain sufficiently his failure to produce them, and his exceptions must therefore be sustained. I do not wish to be harsh with Mr. Dumble, and I shall therefore give him another opportunity to obey the order of the court. Accordingly, it is ordered that he produce the books and other papers of the Stockholders’ Oil Company and of the Dumble Development Company before the master on or before February 1, 1906, and in default thereof that an attachment for contempt be issued by the clerk of the Circuit Court.

The motion to abate the suit is made upon the ground that both the defendant corporations were dissolved on January 9, 1905, by a proclamation of the Governor of Delaware for nonpayment of taxes. It is needless to inquire what force the fact of dissolution might have, if the defendants were corporations of this state. They are Delaware corporations, however, and section 36 of an act of that state, passed on March 10, 1899 (21 Del. Laws, p. 456, c. 273), expressly provides:

“All corporations, whether they expire by their own limitation, or are otherwise dissolved, shall nevertheless be continued for the term of three years from such expiration or dissolution bodies corporate for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits by or against them, and of enabling them gradually to settle and close their business, to dispose of and convey their property, and to divide their capital stock, but not for the purpose of continuing the business for which said corporation shall have been established.”

This section is not confined to suits brought against them in the state of their origin, but is general in its terms, and applies to all suits by or against them, wheresoever brought or defended.

The motion to abate is therefore refused.