discussed Cited "see" In Re: S.C.F., Jr., Appeal of: S.F., Sr. & J.F. See In re T.S., 192 A.3d 1080, 1087 (Pa. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S.Ct. 1187 (2019). 2 “The standard of review in termination of parental rights cases requires appellate courts to accept the findings of fact and credibility determinations of the trial court if they are supported by the record.” Interest of M.V., 203 A.3d 1104, 1111 (Pa. Super. 2019) (citation omitted).

discussed Cited "see" In Re: Adoption of: G.W.-S., Appeal of: E.M.W. See In re T.S., ___ Pa. ___, 192 A.3d 1080 (2018), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 1187 , 203 L.Ed.2d 220 (2019) (establishing presumption that child three years of age or younger cannot form subjective, articulable preference that would necessitate appointment of separate legal counsel to advocate during termination proceeding). 2 The termination decrees and goal change orders are dated February 7, 2019, time stamped February 8, 2019, and entered on the docket on February 11, 2019.

discussed Cited "see" In Re: Adoption of: G.H.W.-S., Appeal of: T.S. See In re T.S., ___ Pa. ___, 192 A.3d 1080 (2018), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 1187 , 203 L.Ed.2d 220 (2019) (establishing presumption that child three years of age or younger cannot form subjective, articulable preference that would necessitate appointment of separate legal counsel to advocate during termination proceeding). 2 The termination decrees and goal change orders are dated February 7, 2019, time stamped February 8, 2019, and entered on the docket on February 11, 2019.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Int. of: S.L.C. Appeal of: N.L.R. See In re Adoption of L.B.M., 161 A.3d 172, 174-75, 180 (Pa. 2017) (plurality); see also In re T.S., 192 A.3d 1080, 1089-90, 1092-93 (Pa. 2018) (reaffirming the ability of an attorney-guardian ad litem to serve a dual role and represent a child’s non-conflicting best interests and legal interests), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 1187 (2019); In re Adoption of K.M.G., ___ A.3d ___, ___, 2019 PA Super 281 , 2019 WL 4392506 , at *4 (Pa. Super. filed Sept. 13, 2019) (en banc) (holding that this Court may raise sua sponte the issue of whether the trial court failed to appoint any counsel for the Child …