At page 872 Affirming a sentence as not excessive3 citing cases
- Lin Chen v. Zum Dev., Inc., 248 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2026).published Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada</i>, 213 AD3d at 872 [internal quotation marks omitted]; <i>see</i> <i>Razdolskaya v Lyubarsky</i>, 160 AD3d 994 , 996).
- Bartlett Plaza, LLC v. Jose, 242 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2025).published Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada , 213 AD3d at 872; John v Elefante , 210 AD3d at 668).
- Avery v. WJM Dev. Corp., 216 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2023).publishedVig Props., LLC v Rahimzada , 213 AD3d at 872 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP , 12 NY3d 553, 559 ).
At page 873 Affirming sentence as not excessive3 citing cases
- Lin Chen v. Zum Dev., Inc., 248 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2026).published Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada</i>, 213 AD3d at 872 [internal quotation marks omitted]; <i>see</i> <i>Razdolskaya v Lyubarsky</i>, 160 AD3d 994 , 996).
- 4 Colonial Dr., LLC v. Suburban Consultants, Ltd., 242 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2025).publishedVig Props., LLC v Rahimzada , 213 AD3d at 873).
- Bartlett Plaza, LLC v. Jose, 242 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2025).published Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada , 213 AD3d at 872; John v Elefante , 210 AD3d at 668).
v.
Sparrock
| People v Sparrock |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 00886 |
| Decided on February 15, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 15, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2022-02891
(Ind. No. 1596/20)
v
Jovan Sparrock, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Lauren Slattery on the memorandum), for respondent.
[*~871–873]
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donald Leo, J.), imposed March 24, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, ZAYAS and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court