v.
Yeager
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 23-30213 FILED
Summary Calendar November 28, 2023
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
David Randolph Yeager, Jr.,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:06-CR-60056-1
Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
David Randolph Yeager, Jr., pleaded true to a violation of a supervised release condition following a state conviction on child pornography charges. The district court sentenced him to 36 months in prison, to be served consecutively to the state sentence, and imposed a lifetime term of supervised release.
_____________________ *
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Yeager challenges the substantive reasonableness of his revocation sentence. This court reviews “a sentence imposed after revocation of supervised release under the plainly unreasonable standard of review.” United States v. Winding, 817 F.3d 910, 913 (5th Cir. 2016).
Consecutive sentencing is the express policy of the Sentencing Guidelines in the revocation context. United States v. Flores, 862 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir. 2017); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) & comment. (n.4). Further, the length of the sentence and the life term of supervised release were supported by the record, and we have repeatedly affirmed statutory maximum sentences above the revocation policy range. See United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013). Thus, Yeager has not shown that the sentence is plainly unreasonable.
AFFIRMED.