Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. Clark
The plaintiff's arguments regarding the continuing violation doctrine, raised for the first time in reply, have not been considered ( see generally Alvarellos v Tassinari , 222 AD3d 815, 820 [2d Dept 2023]; Kogut v Village of Chestnut Ridge , 214 AD3d 777 , 780 [2d Dept 2023]; Gelaj v Gelaj , 164 AD3d 878 , 879-880 [2d Dept 2018]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. Clark
The plaintiff's arguments regarding the continuing violation doctrine, raised for the first time in reply, have not been considered ( see generally Alvarellos v Tassinari , 222 AD3d 815, 820 [2d Dept 2023]; Kogut v Village of Chestnut Ridge , 214 AD3d 777 , 780 [2d Dept 2023]; Gelaj v Gelaj , 164 AD3d 878 , 879-880 [2d Dept 2018]).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Galea
See Alvarellos v. Tassinari, 222 A.D.3d 815 , 201 N.Y.S.3d 489 (2d Dept. 2023); Pena v. Geisinger Community Med.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People ex rel. Blakey
v.
Toulon
v.
Toulon
2023-11827.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 18, 2023.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
People ex rel. Blakey v Toulon (2023 NY Slip Op 06465)
Decided on December 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.
2023-11827
| People ex rel. Blakey v Toulon |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 06465 |
| Decided on December 18, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.
2023-11827
[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Michael Blakey, on behalf of Dushane Telfer, petitioner,
v
Errol D. Toulon, etc., respondent.
v
Errol D. Toulon, etc., respondent.
Michael Blakey, Westhampton Beach, NY, petitioner pro se.
Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Jonathan Estreich of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Dushane Telfer upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 72413/2023/001.
ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.The determination of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).
CONNOLLY, J.P., MALTESE, FORD and LOVE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court