Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, Etc, 241 U.S. 651 (1916). · Go Syfert
Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, Etc, 241 U.S. 651 (1916). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Galanis (ctd, 1977-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1916 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1916 1971 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Galanis
D. Conn. · 1977 · confidence medium
This is an argument that “savors of technicality.” Bingham v. Bradley, supra, 241 U.S. at 517, 36 S.Ct. 634 ; Shapiro v. Ferrandina, supra, 478 F.2d at 904 . [I]f the certificates, signatures, etc. are in substantial conformity to the requirements of the statute, and give reasonable assurance of authenticity, it is sufficient.
cited Cited "see" Arambasic v. Ashcroft
D.S.D. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff'd per curiam, 241 U.S. 651 , 36 S.Ct. 721 , 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916). 6 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mackin
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70, 73-74 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff’d per curiam, 241 U.S. 651 , 36 S.Ct. 721 , 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916); Garcia-Guillern v. United States, supra, 450 F.2d at 1192 ; In re Gonzalez, 217 F.Supp. 717, 722 (S.D.N.Y.1963).
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Desmond MacKin by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. United States of America v. Desmond MacKin Desmond MacKin v. George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70, 73-74 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff'd per curiam, 241 U.S. 651 , 36 S.Ct. 721 , 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916); Garcia-Guillern v. United States, supra, 450 F.2d at 1192 ; In re Gonzalez, 217 F.Supp. 717, 722 (S.D.N.Y.1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln
v.
James M. Power, Marshal, Etc
793.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1916.
241 U.S. 651
Published

241 U.S. 651

36 S.Ct. 721

60 L.Ed. 1222

IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.

No. 793.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 1, 1916

Per Curiam:

1

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334, 34 L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508, 40 L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689; Bryant v. United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105, 42 L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278, 46 L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406, 407, 54 L. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523, 57 L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610, 54 L. ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580, 59 L. ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31, 60 L. ed. —, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.

2

Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.

3

Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.