Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, 657 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Farnsworth v. Farnsworth, 657 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brenda L. FARNSWORTH, Appellant,
v.
Harold C. FARNSWORTH, Jr., Appellee.
94-3269.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 19, 1995.
Published opinion
657 So. 2d 1273
1995 WL 421136
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

H. Stephen Pennypacker of Pennypacker & Smith, Gainesville, for appellant.

[*1274] Dudley P. Hardy of Hardy & Leukel; Darla Jean Christopher of Brown and Christopher, Starke, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Brenda L. Farnsworth, appeals an order which terminated the alimony obligation of her former husband, Harold C. Farnsworth, and ruled that the former husband's obligation in the marital settlement agreement to furnish college expenses for the parties' daughter was a contractual obligation, enforceable by the daughter as a third-party beneficiary, and not a child support obligation. We conclude that the trial court's order did not constitute an abuse of discretion and, accordingly, we affirm. At oral argument of this cause, counsel agreed that, in its order on the former wife's motion for rehearing, the trial court reserved jurisdiction on the issue of whether the former husband's reduction in income was permanent in nature. Thus, the trial court may revisit the issue of alimony should changed circumstances be demonstrated.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.