How cited: Vick v. Vick · Go Syfert

Vick v. Vick (1997)

green · 48 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 24 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 24
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199820122026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Kelley v. Akers (2001)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
"The judgment of the trial court changing custody from the mother to the father is hereby reversed and a judgment is entered restoring custody to the mother." 688 So.2d at 855-56 (emphasis added.) The Vick case represents a situation even more egregious than the situation now before us.
emphasis added.
green Ladden v. Ladden (2010)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
First, the father argues that the trial court was required to consider (1) prior changes of residence by the mother, citing Taft v. Taft, 553 So.2d 1157, 1158 (Ala.Civ.App.1989); (2) the mother’s interference with visitation, citing Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); and (3) attempts by the mother to diminish the relationship between the father and the *715 child, citing Calabrisi v. Boone, 470 So.2d 1255, 1258 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).
green Cjl v. Mwb (2003)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala.Civ.App.1981).
green C.J.L. v. M.W.B. (2003)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala.Civ.App.1981).
green McGhee v. McGhee (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
“The evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change.” Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Braswell v. Braswell, 460 So.2d 1339, 1341 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).
green Daniel Colby Courson v. Heather C. Hurston (2025)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Thus, the record does not contain an "amalgamation" of issues sufficient to establish a material change in circumstances. "[W]e are compelled to reiterate that, in matters of child custody, frequent disruptions are discouraged." Vick v. Vick, 688 So. 2d 852, 856 (Ala. Civ.
green Ingram v. Matthews (2015)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Ex parte McLendon, 455 So.2d 863, 866 (Ala.1984).” Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.
green Mb v. Sb (2009)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
App.2003) ("Our decisions have consistently indicated that a change of custody is not an appropriate sanction for visitation problems." (citing Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); and Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala.Civ.App. 1981))).
green M.B. v. S.B. (2009)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
App.2003) (“Our decisions have consistently indicated that a change of custody is not an appropriate sanction for visitation problems.” (citing Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); and Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala.Civ.App. 1981))).
green Brooks v. Brooks (2008)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
See Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); and Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala. Civ.App.1981).
green Bledsoe v. Cleghorn (2007)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.
green Tjh v. Snf (2006)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Ex parte McLendon, 455 So.2d 863, 866 (Ala.1984).'" *675 Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826 (Ala. Civ.App.2001) (quoting Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997)).
green T.J.H. v. S.N.F. (2006)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Ex parte McLendon, 455 So.2d 863, 866 (Ala.1984).’” Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (quoting Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997)).
green B.S.L. v. S.E. (2003)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
I, 826 So.2d at 893 (quoting Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997)).
green Bsl v. Se (2003)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
I, 826 So.2d at 893 (quoting Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997)).
green Sg v. Pc (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
See B.S.L. v. S.E., supra; C.P. v. M.K., supra. On remand we remind the juvenile court that "[t]he evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change [in custody]." Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).
green S.G. v. P.C. (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
See B.S.L. v. S.E., supra; C.P. v. M.K., supra. On remand we remind the juvenile court that “[t]he evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change [in custody].” Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).
green L.M.J. v. J.I.J. (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
Kelley v. Akers, 793 So.2d 821, 826-27 (Ala.Civ.App.2001); Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Means v. Means, 512 So.2d 1386, 1389 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Pons v. Phillips, 406 So.2d 932, 935 (Ala.Civ.App.1981).
green Ex Parte Pankey (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala.
Ex parte McLendon, 455 So.2d at 866 . `The evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change.' Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997)." B.S.L. v. S.E., 826 So.2d 890 , (Ala.Civ.App. 2002). [13] I find it odd to be criticized for using facts contained in an opinion issued by the Court of Civil Appeals.
green Bsl v. Se (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
"The evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change." Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).
green B.S.L. v. S.E. (2002)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
“The evidence must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change.” Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).
green Statz v. McWaters (1998)
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
“The evidence [supporting a change in custody] must be so substantial as to show an obvious and overwhelming necessity for a change.” Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 855 (Ala.Civ.App.1997) (citing Klapal v. Brannon, 610 So.2d 1167 (Ala.Civ.App.1992)).
green C.A.H. v. J.B.S. (2010)
Cited · Ala. Civ. App. · signal: see
See Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997) (reversing a judgment modifying custody from the mother to the father based in part on the fact that the father had failed to present “more detailed evidence regarding the living situation available with the father and the present conditions of the mother’s home”).
green Rose v. Jackson (2009)
Cited (see also) · Ala. Civ. App. · signal: see also
Id. at 827 ; see also Vick v. Vick, 688 So.2d 852, 856 (Ala.Civ.App.1997).