Holcomb v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (2009)
green
· 15 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Robert Wilson v. Hunter Lee Guy (2020)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 822 ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009) (“Rules as to the admissibility of evidence are applicable in summary judgment proceedings, since the statute provides that all affidavits, depositions, etc. shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in the evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.
green
Scott Norton v. Ashden Anderson (2013)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 822 ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009) (“Rules as to the admissibility of evidence are applicable in summary judgment proceedings, since the statute provides that all affidavits, depositions, etc. 9 appears only in the form of a few letters from them to Jones.
green
Anderson v. Jones (2013)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 822 ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009) (“Rules as to the admissibility of evidence are applicable in summary judgment proceedings, since the statute provides that all affidavits, depositions, etc. ‘shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in the evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.’OCGA § 9-11-56 (e).”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Kaylor v. Atwell, 251 Ga. App. 270, 273 (2)…
green
Illinois Central Railroad v. Young (2012)
Holcomb v. Norfolk S. Ry., 295 Ga.App. 821 , 673 S.E.2d 268, 270-71 (2009) (quoting Western & A.R.
quoting Western & A.R. Co. v. Ferguson, 113 Ga. 708 , 39 S.E. 306, 308-09 (1901)
green
Udoinyion v. Michelin North America, Inc. (2011)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 822 ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009) (rules as to the admissibility of evidence apply in summary judgment proceedings).
green
Bradford Mortgage Co. v. Johnnie Ganem Appraisal Co. (2011)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 822 ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009). 6 See, e.g., Johns v. Hous.
green
Weston v. Dun Transportation & Stringer, Inc. (2010)
Co., 295 Ga. App. 821, 824-825 (1) ( 673 SE2d 268 ) (2009) (Because any ordinarily prudent person knows that walking across railroad tracks is subject to the dangers incident to the operation of trains on the track, and because the plaintiff failed to listen for a ringing hell or look for an approaching train until she stepped into the path of danger, the trial court properly granted the railroad’s motion for summary judgment.); Lowery’s Tavern v. Dudukovich, 234 Ga. App. at…