How cited: In Re BSH · Go Syfert

In Re BSH (2009)

green · 25 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 8
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green George Allan Bolton v. Angela Camile Bolton (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
Ann . § 154.014(b) (West 2009); In re B.S.H. , 308 S.W.3d 76, 81 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.).
green in Re J. J. F., a Child (2014)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“In making this determination, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s order, indulging every legal presumption in its favor.” In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 78 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.).
green Fitch, Leanne R. v. Fitch, Carl W. (2013)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Bolton v. Bolton, No. 01-10-00193-CV, 2011 WL 286166 , at *6 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 27, 2011, no pet.) (“The express intent of the obligor as of the time he made the payment is controlling over whether the excess is to be treated as credit or not.”); In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 79 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.) (“[W]here an individual obligee receives from an obligor . . . child support payment that exceeds the court-ordered amount, the trial court s…
green in the Interest of J.A.L., K.D.L, and M.R.L. (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 78 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.); In re T.D.C., 91 S.W.3d 865, 872 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 2002, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g); see In re A.B.H., 266 S.W.3d 596, 601 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2008, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (applying standard).
green in the Interest of J.A.L., K.D.L, and M.R.L. (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re B.S.H. , 308 S.W.3d 76, 78 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.); In re T.D.C. , 91 S.W.3d 865, 872 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g); see In re A.B.H. , 266 S.W.3d 596 , 601 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2008, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (applying standard).
green in the Interest of T.A.W., L.J.W., M.M.W., J.M.W., Minor Children (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 78 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.); In re P.J.H., 25 S.W.3d 402, 405 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, no pet.).
green in the Interest of E.A.E., O.E., C.B.E., C.E., C.E., and C.E., Children (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 78 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2009, no pet.); In re P.J.H., 25 S.W.3d 402, 405 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2000, no pet.).
green Christine Troiani v. Anthony Troiani (2019)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See In re B.S.H., 308 S.W.3d 76, 81 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, no pet.) (“To construe section 154.012 to automatically make any increased support payment an advance payment against future obligations, would be contrary to the common law principle that an obligor may voluntarily provide additional support for his or her child.”).