How cited: Aguilar v. State · Go Syfert

Aguilar v. State (2006)

green · 14 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 9
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Jeremy Wade Holloway v. State of Mississippi (2015)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
“This Court reviews the rulings of the trial court admitting or excluding evidence for abuse of discretion.” Aguilar v. State, 955 So.2d 386, 392 (¶ 19) (Miss.Ct.App.2006) (citing Ladnier v. State, 878 So.2d 926, 933 (¶ 27) (Miss.2004)).
green Thomas Pustay v. State of Mississippi (2016)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Next, Pustay argues the trial court erred in excluding evidence of Jane’s past sexual behavior and prior false allegations of sexual assault under Mississippi Rules of Evidence 412(b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(C). ¶ 77, As stated, “[t]his Court reviews the rulings of the trial court admitting or excluding evidence for abuse of discretion.” Aguilar v. State, 955 So.2d 386, 392 (¶ 19) (Miss.Ct.App.2006) (citing Ladnier v. State, 878 So.2d 926, 933 (¶ 27) (Miss. 2004)).
green Casey Mark Burgess v. State of Mississippi (2015)
Rule Authority · Miss. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Cage v. State, 149 So.3d 1038, 1045-46 (Miss.2014); Aguilar v. State, 955 So.2d 386, 393 (Miss.Ct.App.2006).
green Terrance Alexander a/k/a Terrance Lamont Alexander v. State of Mississippi (2024)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Ct. App. 2002). 15 In Aguilar v. State, 955 So. 2d 386, 391 (¶15) (Miss.
green Willie Bays a/k/a Willie Bays, Sr. v. State of Mississippi (2022)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
“An error in the admission or exclusion of evidence is not grounds for reversal unless the error affected a substantial right of a party.” Aguilar v. State, 955 So. 2d 386, 392 (¶19) (Miss.
green William Wofford a/k/a William Scott Wofford v. State of Mississippi (2022)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Thus, “[a]n error in the admission or exclusion of evidence is not grounds for reversal unless the error affected a substantial right of a party.” Aguilar v. State, 955 So. 2d 386, 392 (¶19) (Miss.
green Travis Cortez Tate a/k/a Travis Tate a/k/a Travis C. Tate v. State of Mississippi (2021)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Thus, “[a]n error in the admission or exclusion of evidence is not grounds for reversal unless the error affected a substantial right of a party.” Aguilar v. State, 955 So. 2d 386, 392 (¶19) (Miss.
green Ladd v. State (2007)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Aguilar v. State, 955 So.2d 386, 393 (¶22) (Miss.Ct.
overruled on other grounds
green Jeremy Cage v. State of Mississippi (2014)
Cited · Miss. · signal: see
See Aguilar v. State, 955 So.2d 386, 393 (Miss.Ct.App.2006); Levy v. State, 724 So.2d 405, 409 (Miss.Ct.App.1998).